Quote:
Originally Posted by AtkinsonDan
It does not need to be a monopoly, removing a significant chunk of imports would still cripple China's economy.
|
As I already pointed out, the U.S. does not have a monopoly on the raw materials that China imports. Other countries would gladly export more raw materials to China to replace any shortfall from the U.S.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enough_Already
I see you come from the Biden I can't do anything school. The American people are suffering, it is time to do something.
|
I’m a Canadian. My viewpoints are not formed by Biden. I don’t think I’ve even watched the man speak more than a handful of times.
Taking action based on actual facts is intelligent. Taking action based on the false assumption that the U.S. can collapse the Chinese economy because of its imaginary monopoly of raw materials is dumb. Any such action will not meet the intended goal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCoffee57
Russia primarily exports natural gas. I'm not sure if Russia can offset this by exporting more oil to China.
China and Russia share an incredibly long landborder with many pipelines. If China could buy from Russia, it would already being so, since it will be cheaper than importing by ship from the USA.
|
It is.
China quietly increases purchases of low-priced Russian oil
Quote:
China is quietly ramping up purchases of oil from Russia at bargain prices, according to shipping data and oil traders who spoke to Reuters, filling the vacuum left by Western buyers backing away from business with Russia after its invasion of Ukraine in February.
|
Quote:
The low price of Russia’s oil – spot differentials are about $29 less per barrel compared with before the invasion, according to traders - is a boon for China’s refiners as they face shrinking margins in a slowing economy. The price is well below competing barrels from the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the United States.
|
That’s why I posted that the bill by Rubio and Scott appears to be simply political theater.