Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2022, 10:40 AM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 8 days ago)
 
35,633 posts, read 17,968,125 times
Reputation: 50660

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Where did I "insist he burned up a cop car"? I previously said "damaged" and that "It's also possible that the fire may have damaged the underside of the car.", yanno, cause fire in a close proximity tends do that. Stop putting words in my mouth and stop deflecting, prove that the cop vehicle wasn't "damaged".
Find any article that indicates the car was damaged at all.

YOU prove it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2022, 10:44 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,597 posts, read 12,543,921 times
Reputation: 10477
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
Find any article that indicates the car was damaged at all.

YOU prove it.
You're the one insisting that what he had done is fine since nothing happened to the police vehicle. But you don't want to back up your stance that the vehicle was undamaged....okay then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2022, 10:45 AM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,008,032 times
Reputation: 26919
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
Find any article that indicates the car was damaged at all.

YOU prove it.
Yeah, I'm not seeng it either.

If something happened, he's charged; if it didn't, he's charged lesser, or certain charges are dropped. If no arson occurred he obviously can't be charged with arson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2022, 03:02 PM
 
1,812 posts, read 2,224,517 times
Reputation: 2466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
...you posted nothing....zero....to contradict what Gateway said



one quick search and you wouldn't have wasted your time.....or ours

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Earle_Sullivan

if he's not antifa.....then why wasn't he charged?/jailed?....like the rest.....because of his color
HE WAS CHARGED. Check my other link, it's his charging document. He just hasn't gone to trial yet.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defe...ivan-john-earl

Quote:
SULLIVAN, John Earl
Case Number:
1:21-cr-78
Charge(s):
Obstruction of an Official Proceeding; Civil Disorder; Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Parading, Demonstrating, o rPicketing in a Capitol Building; Aiding and Abetting
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2022, 03:05 PM
 
19,798 posts, read 18,085,519 times
Reputation: 17284
Quote:
Originally Posted by swake View Post
The accused entered into a diversion agreement with prosecutors that was approved by a judge. He did probation and anger management classes. This is pretty standard stuff.

This is the kind of agreement many of the 1/6 rioters are entering into.

So far 306 of the more than 860 rioters that have been charged so far have pled guilty in agreements with prosecutors.

https://www.insider.com/capitol-riot...ed-list-2021-5
How many of the sub-group of 306 attempted arson?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2022, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
It’s almost like a white man getting VERY sternly yelled at for trying to vote fraudulently, and a black woman asking if she could vote yet, being told yes, and getting seven years.

We all know the justice system is messed up.
The only thing messed up here is your absurd post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2022, 08:41 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,597,947 times
Reputation: 15341
We are discussing the wrong topic, when 'publicly elected officials'....need to be protected from the public itself! LOL


Hmm, I wonder what that is indicative of? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top