Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Supreme Court in a nutshell: guns are important enough to be ruled by a national federal standard with which the states cannot interfere; women are not.
1. guns are a constitutional right
2. abortions are not
3. many women are pro life and agree with the decision
On page 119 of the opinion, see Thomas' concurring opinion where he goes further, stating:
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell."
See also his explanation:
*Griswold v. Connecticut purported not to rely on the Due Process Clause, but rather reasoned “that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights”—including rights enumerated in the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments—“have penumbras, formed by emanations,” that create “zones of privacy.” Since Griswold, the Court, perhaps recognizing the facial absurdity of Griswold’s penumbral argument, has characterized the decision as one rooted in substantive due process.
In other words, the cases leading up to the unconstitutional decision in Roe v Wade were themselves so silly and airy-fairy, that the Court would be derelict in their duty to the Constitution, to not re-examine them too.
But if they are solidly founded on the Constitution as you keep claiming, why are you so afraid of them being re-examined?
The Supreme Court in a nutshell: guns are important enough to be ruled by a national federal standard with which the states cannot interfere; women are not.
You'll still be able to murder your own kids, don't worry.
See also his explanation:
*Griswold v. Connecticut purported not to rely on the Due Process Clause, but rather reasoned “that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights”—including rights enumerated in the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments—“have penumbras, formed by emanations,” that create “zones of privacy.” Since Griswold, the Court, perhaps recognizing the facial absurdity of Griswold’s penumbral argument, has characterized the decision as one rooted in substantive due process.
In other words, the cases leading up to the unconstitutional decision in Roe v Wade were themselves so silly and airy-fairy, that the Court would be derelict in their duty to the Constitution, to not re-examine them too.
But if they are solidly founded on the Constitution as you keep claiming, why are you so afraid of them being re-examined?
Abortion was based on right to privacy. Apparently the GOP doesn't believe in right to privacy and so they will go after contraceptives.
I thank God for President Trump and his selection of three fine justices to the Supreme Court of the United States, namely Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.
The Supreme Court in a nutshell: guns are important enough to be ruled by a national federal standard with which the states cannot interfere; women are not.
Doesn't seem like you understand how the constitution works.
Guns are part of the 2nd amendment. They over rulled NY state because it was keeping people the ability to bear arms and protect themselves in public.
The Supreme Court in a nutshell: guns are important enough to be ruled by a national federal standard with which the states cannot interfere; women are not.
As I said earlier, the Leftist maxim of "If you can't reply or discuss honestly, lie and exaggerate instead" is getting a major workout today.
Abortion was based on right to privacy. Apparently the GOP doesn't believe in right to privacy and so they will go after contraceptives and gay marriage.
Gay marriage isn't based on a right to privacy, so that point doesn't work.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
