Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:09 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,717 posts, read 7,595,563 times
Reputation: 14985

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by moguldreamer View Post
This is how Congress wants it.
Too bad Congress doesn't get what it wants in this case.

After the Dobbs ruling, the Fed govt (that includes Congress) has no power to make ANY laws on abortion.

Actually they never did, but the Supremes in 1973 stole a power belonging to the states, awarded it to themselves, and legislated from the bench to illegally make law on abortion themselves.

The Dobb decision last week, announced they had been caught, that 1973 decision (and Casey) were overruled, and the power to make laws on abortion was returned to the states and the people where it always belonged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:10 PM
 
6,361 posts, read 2,696,519 times
Reputation: 6097
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
This.
If congress codifies abortion rights, it becomes the federal law.
If congress makes abortions illegal, that becomes the federal law.
Scotus must abide by the laws of the land, whatever they may be.
How does the OP not understand how laws are enacted?
Congress COULD make such laws. but as soon as either a law codifies abortion rights or makes abortion illegal the "other side" will challenge the law in the Courts as soon as it is signed. Using the exact same argument of not the authority of the Congress.

If it gets to the Supreme Court and they say the law is Unconstitutional then it is no longer the law of the land. So instead of going through all of this, which would likely end up with any law being tossed out. If people are that set for "abortion rights" then get the States to codify the rights into law. At this point, I think there are only about 16 states where it is illegal in most cases. And when the initial fallout from the decision settles, there will probably be even fewer states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:10 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,054 posts, read 18,216,027 times
Reputation: 34926
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
This.
If congress codifies abortion rights, it becomes the federal law.
If congress makes abortions illegal, that becomes the federal law.
Scotus must abide by the laws of the land, whatever they may be.
How does the OP not understand how laws are enacted?
I'll wager you did not read the decision. States can regulate and then be challenged to a higher court.
The way the law is supposed to work.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...-1392_6j37.pdf
Under the Court’s precedents, rational-basis review is the appro- priate standard to apply when state abortion regulations undergo constitutional challenge. Given that procuring an abortion is not a fundamental constitutional right, it follows that the States may regulate abortion for legitimate reasons, and when such regulations are challenged under the Constitution, courts cannot “substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:23 PM
 
9,434 posts, read 4,248,521 times
Reputation: 7018
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNSense View Post
Congress COULD make such laws. but as soon as either a law codifies abortion rights or makes abortion illegal the "other side" will challenge the law in the Courts as soon as it is signed. Using the exact same argument of not the authority of the Congress.

If it gets to the Supreme Court and they say the law is Unconstitutional then it is no longer the law of the land. So instead of going through all of this, which would likely end up with any law being tossed out. If people are that set for "abortion rights" then get the States to codify the rights into law. At this point, I think there are only about 16 states where it is illegal in most cases. And when the initial fallout from the decision settles, there will probably be even fewer states.
I am not a constitutional expert but I think your logic is flawed. I have once taken part in writing a federal laws, a big one that were passed, but have counted as on the legal expert for guidance. It is above my pay grade.
Do you have practical experience in writing federal legislation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:26 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,054 posts, read 18,216,027 times
Reputation: 34926
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
I am not a constitutional expert but I think your logic is flawed. I have once taken part in writing a federal laws, a big one that were passed, but have counted as on the legal expert for guidance. It is above my pay grade.
Do you have practical experience in writing federal legislation?
I posted the SC ruling. States can regulate. And those regulations can be challenged to a higher court.

Congress can't do SQUAT.

If English is your first language you should be able to read it with no problem. I posted the link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:27 PM
 
25,838 posts, read 16,515,156 times
Reputation: 16024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
To put in the legal code, i.e. pass a law.

Edit: BTW, your screen name cracks me up.
Thanks, but it won’t be constitutionally protected so Mike Pence can sign an order and stop it on day one if example he won the ‘24 Presidency I’m guessing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:28 PM
 
9,434 posts, read 4,248,521 times
Reputation: 7018
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
I posted the SC ruling. States can regulate. And those regulations can be challenged to a higher court.

Congress can't do SQUAT.

If English is your first language you should be able to read it with no problem. I posted the link.
I have spent to much time in dc speaking to real experts to know I don’t know. I also know you don’t know and I probably have more experience than you.
I’m going to trust bidens team of constitutional experts know more than either of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:33 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,054 posts, read 18,216,027 times
Reputation: 34926
Quote:
Originally Posted by foodyum View Post
I have spent to much time in dc speaking to real experts to know I don’t know. I also know you don’t know and I probably have more experience than you.
I’m going to trust bidens team of constitutional experts know more than either of us.
It's simple English...no legal mumbo jumbo

"....the States may regulate abortion..."

What part of that is not clear ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:34 PM
 
9,434 posts, read 4,248,521 times
Reputation: 7018
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
It's simple English...no legal mumbo jumbo

"....the States may regulate abortion..."

What part of that is not clear ?
Well then you have nothing to worry about.
You already know the answer and it works for you.
You go girl!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2022, 03:36 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,717 posts, read 7,595,563 times
Reputation: 14985
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Thanks, but it won’t be constitutionally protected so Mike Pence can sign an order and stop it on day one if example he won the ‘24 Presidency I’m guessing.
Can stop what?

As I've already pointed out, the Supremes ruled last week that NO ONE in the federal government can make laws about abortion. Congress can't make such laws, Fed Courts can't legislate from the bench on abortion as the Roe court did, the Prez can't issue an EO on abortion.

(wonder how many more times I'm going to have to point this out AGAIN in the next month or three, to people who persist in not reading the decision before they try to tell us what the decision says? )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top