Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2022, 09:53 AM
 
2,355 posts, read 1,152,668 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

The issue is that his security detail DID.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2022, 09:55 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,199 posts, read 7,225,101 times
Reputation: 17473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
You left out a very important quote:



There is no rule saying people can't travel to those states, only that no state funds may be used.

So what is the issue?
The issue was already pointed out in several previous posts. If Montana was as bad as Newsom makes it out to be to have him ban any California official business travel to Montana, then regardless if it is personal or business, he should stand by his position.

Clearly Montana is not bad or else he wouldn’t have vacationed there which shows that his ban is purely political pettiness, which then shows how petty and hateful the Democrats are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 09:57 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,381,866 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankNSense View Post
Really?

He is the Governor of the most populous state in the United States. He is one of the most high-profile politicians because of this and his aspirations for higher office.

And you seriously asking if he has a security detail with him?

Yes, I'm really looking for confirmation that he has a security detail with him - just like any intellectually honest person should.

Once we have confirmation on that front, we can then discuss who paid for the security if they were on the trip.

Why would anyone prefer to jump to conclusions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 10:04 AM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,637,791 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedster24 View Post
The issue is that his security detail DID.
Maybe. Maybe the reporter who did this piece is so dumb that they failed to ask this question and give their article some actual teeth. Or maybe this quote is correct:

Quote:
The Office of the Governor clarified that Newsom did not use state funds for the trip.
Or maybe the security detail falls under one of the legislated exceptions. There are exceptions you know. For example, for law enforcement and district attorneys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 10:10 AM
 
6,389 posts, read 2,710,079 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Yes, I'm really looking for confirmation that he has a security detail with him - just like any intellectually honest person should.

Once we have confirmation on that front, we can then discuss who paid for the security if they were on the trip.

Why would anyone prefer to jump to conclusions?
Right...LOL

Since they won't discuss his security, we will never get that confirmation.

Since we will never get that confirmation, then there is a need to find out who paid for it.

Since there is no need to find out who paid for it, we don't need proof of it being paid for by the State.

Since there was no proof that he used State funds then there is no issue.

Move Along...Nothing to see here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 10:11 AM
 
8,016 posts, read 5,859,543 times
Reputation: 9682
All the men in CA are like, "Yeah, he probably shouldn't have done that..........BUT HIS HAIR IS SO PRETTY, DON'T YOU THINK?"

Hardly a shock that this hypocritical mouth-breather is related to Nancy and Pauli "Drinkin' and Drivin'" Pelosi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 10:16 AM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,527,813 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
All the men in CA are like, "Yeah, he probably shouldn't have done that..........BUT HIS HAIR IS SO PRETTY, DON'T YOU THINK?"

Hardly a shock that this hypocritical mouth-breather is related to Nancy and Pauli "Drinkin' and Drivin'" Pelosi.
Not the straight men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 10:29 AM
 
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
17,623 posts, read 6,911,503 times
Reputation: 16533
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Sure.

Does he have a security detail with him?
He probably doesn’t need a security detail in Montana, in stark contrast to the crime ridden dump Newsome is in charge of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 10:37 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,102 posts, read 18,269,535 times
Reputation: 34976
They are all like that....

Pelosi and her hair
Birx and her Thanksgiving vacation
Fauci and no mask, mask, triple mask and he's seen with no mask
All those Governors and their parties and restaurant outings and vacations
All those politicians that flew to open states to have vacations

Geez..wake up people. These "elite" tell you to lock your doors and stay inside and the majority do it while they go off and live life.


As they say:

Fool me once, shame on you
Fool me twice..shame on me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2022, 10:37 AM
 
2,355 posts, read 1,152,668 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Dignitary Protection Section (DPS) operates from both Los Angeles and Sacramento and is responsible for the protection of state constitutional officers including: the Governor, First Lady, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, State Controller, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the State Insurance Commissioner. When directed by the Commissioner’s Office, DPS provides protective services to other elected officials
https://www.chp.ca.gov/find-an-offic...ection-section
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top