Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Vote. Out. Every. Single. Democrat. When Governor McAuliffe stated that "parents should not dictate their children's education", he meant it. Democrats do not believe your children are truly yours, but the state's...
Now, you may be wondering, the parents have no say in their thirteen year old's hacked up genitalia, but, at least they do not have to foot the bill, right? WRONG!
You have NO say in the healthcare of your thirteen year old, but you sure as h*ll will foot the bill for it...
Cultural Marxism, at its finest... And, this all started with, "they just want to get married"... We have been on the slippery slope, ever since...
Can a parent remove a kid from the family health insurance policy?
Can a parent remove a kid from the family health insurance policy?
Tough love?
Often no, especially if theres a divorce decree for example.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FordBronco1967
What does that have to do with the price of eggs? Why should such a law be passed in the first place?
It really is eye opening to see how the Democratic Party believes that children belong to the state, not their parents...
It IS sort of the crux of the matter. If its not occurring at all, then this is much adui over nothing. If it IS occurring, then the DETAILS matter too-believe it or not there are some truly valid reasons for a tiny tiny number of people to do this while young. IE birth defects of misgendering when you are born with both sets,e tc etc etc
Turns out once you start micro-managing peoples healthcare, and personal lives things get tricky huh GOP?
It IS sort of the crux of the matter. If its not occurring at all, then this is much adui over nothing. If it IS occurring, then the DETAILS matter too-believe it or not there are some truly valid reasons for a tiny tiny number of people to do this while young. IE birth defects of misgendering when you are born with both sets,e tc etc etc
Turns out once you start micro-managing peoples healthcare, and personal lives things get tricky huh GOP?
And those exceptions have always been handled.
Public policy should be based on the needs of the majority, with appropriate exceptions for the exceptions. "Worst case scenarios" make bad law.
Often no, especially if theres a divorce decree for example.
It IS sort of the crux of the matter. If its not occurring at all, then this is much adui over nothing. If it IS occurring, then the DETAILS matter too-believe it or not there are some truly valid reasons for a tiny tiny number of people to do this while young. IE birth defects of misgendering when you are born with both sets,e tc etc etc
Turns out once you start micro-managing peoples healthcare, and personal lives things get tricky huh GOP?
Calling out the GOP for Obamacare? Too funny
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
