Maniac control needed - time to restore forced treatment & institutionalization

[TamaraSavannah]

Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd

The majority of these shooters have something in common. They feel like they do not matter, that no one cares. They have given up on life and instead of taking their own they decide to go out with a bang. If they cannot be rich and famous they will be infamous and dead. What these young guys need most is a girlfriend. They need to get laid to get the aggression out of them. If they had something to live for most wouldn't seek to murder and die.
..........

Well, that's certainly throwing fat on the fire for you make it sound like there is someone for everyone or that one just goes down to the dealership and picks one out.


What happens to this solution when they are told such a lie that there are girlfriends out there for them, they believe it, and then they find out that no one will have them?

[Stepnking]

Originally Posted by TamaraSavannah

Hmmmmm, rather reminds me of a psychology conference where pornographic addiction came up. For the symptoms they were suggesting......they could be applied to a member of the Navy!

Do you think a member of the Navy, or anyone else for that matter could not have a pornographic addiction?

Is a Marine someone with aggressive tendencies, who is antisocial outside of the Marines?

Not necessarily. I know many enlisted and veteran Marines who enjoy social activities.

Is that not how, traditionally, anyhow, we want them to be?

Again, not necessarily. Why would you?

Is it their fault, is it a sign to lock them up if the children of a service member exhibits such qualities of the parent?[Who is talking about locking anyone up? You are making up stories as we go along.

Of course.{quote]

B: I can't say for the DSM-V but something I found with society using the DSM-IV is that they took the symptoms, found they fit a certain person in question, and proclaimed the person that affliction.....while missing a key component in almost every single one that makes it an affliction....."if it is hindering the person in question".

Psychologists have no solidarity of consensus on DSM-IV. I doubt society outside of the mental health field is using anything.

People can have an affliction but still be "okay" if it isn't causing them a problem.

As likely most of us do, but we are not all mass murderers.

.......................and then, there is C: Whether chronic or acute, remember this when one is trying to figure out who is good or not:

"But he had such an honest face!"--Romana I
"Romana, you can't be a good crook with a dishonest face, can you?"--The Doctor

"You can't judge a book by its cover"