Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-21-2022, 10:56 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,433 posts, read 12,481,493 times
Reputation: 10427

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
She filed the report to a state agency, that agency had the proof, she didn't need to provide proof.
Then she should sue the agency for hiding it, right?

 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:00 AM
 
50,700 posts, read 36,402,571 times
Reputation: 76507
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
Then she should sue the agency for hiding it, right?
I don’t think they hid it. I really think the AG just wanted to make some kind of political statement and didn’t even check first.
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:06 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,433 posts, read 12,481,493 times
Reputation: 10427
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
I don’t think they hid it. I really think the AG just wanted to make some kind of political statement and didn’t even check first.
suurre. Proof?
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:08 AM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,728,957 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
The information was a matter of record, she didn't need to produce or share anything. They had the info. It was a sham investigation, politically motivated..
They say that they could not find record of this info so what you claim is untrue.
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:08 AM
 
50,700 posts, read 36,402,571 times
Reputation: 76507
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
suurre. Proof?
I don’t have proof. That’s why I preceded my statement with “I think” and not “This is what happened”. But clearly the records were obtainable from the state agency that she filed the report to.
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:10 AM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,728,957 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
I'm guessing she has also had to hire security.
She did but that has nothing at all to do with legal fees. Surely the $300K she raised will cover that.
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:10 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,433 posts, read 12,481,493 times
Reputation: 10427
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
I don’t have proof. That’s why I preceded my statement with “I think” and not “This is what happened”. But clearly the records were obtainable from the state agency that she filed the report to.
Then, why did it take the media so long to find the records?
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:15 AM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,728,957 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
I don’t have proof. That’s why I preceded my statement with “I think” and not “This is what happened”. But clearly the records were obtainable from the state agency that she filed the report to.
Clearly these records were not attainable. The Washington Post tried to find them and could not, hence their story questioning the initial claim
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:19 AM
 
50,700 posts, read 36,402,571 times
Reputation: 76507
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Clearly these records were not attainable. The Washington Post tried to find them and could not, hence their story questioning the initial claim
Why would the press have had access to records like this? They’d be protected by HIPAA I would imagine.
 
Old 07-21-2022, 11:26 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,433 posts, read 12,481,493 times
Reputation: 10427
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
Why would the press have had access to records like this? They’d be protected by HIPAA I would imagine.
From what I understand, they contacted the agencies and asked IF they have records that fit the time, age, doctor, etc., ... they did not ask for the records themselves. There is no personal or private info involved when doing that.

edit to add, eventually the media finally did obtain the records, though with the personal and private info redacted...so it's not like they couldn't get those redacted reports a week or better earlier.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top