Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The worst accusation I've seen come out of the 1/6 hearings has been that he didn't "call off" the protesters when they stormed the capital. I've seen nothing to suggest he directed them to storm the capital, or had the power to order them to not do so. I think of the DOJ tries to charge him with anything, they're going to have a hard time coming up with charges that could stick.
Of course they may not care, and this is just a bald faced attempt to influence the November elections, and keep him from running again in 2024.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,465 posts, read 12,487,658 times
Reputation: 10438
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom
I think that's what the DOJ is trying to determine.
So it's yet to be determined if he did or didn't commit a crime. The anti-Trumps seem to think he's guilty and had thought that way over everything Trump over the past 7 years. Maybe someone should explain to them how "innocent until proven guilty" works?
The worst accusation I've seen come out of the 1/6 hearings has been that he didn't "call off" the protesters when they stormed the capital.
1. He instigated a riot
2. Contrary to his vows of office, he did not protect the Capitol , the Constitution or the nation
3. He failed to quell an armed insurrection
4. He lied in his teeth about the results of the balloting
5. He was actively involved in finding and submitting to Congress false electors
6. He urged the GA secretary of state to commit vote fraud
plus
He petulantly failed to welcome his successor to the White House.
He put his selfish needs to appear to succeed before the good of the nation.
The 'true believers' make up excuses for all this.
So it's yet to be determined if he did or didn't commit a crime. The anti-Trumps seem to think he's guilty and had thought that way over everything Trump over the past 7 years. Maybe someone should explain to them how "innocent until proven guilty" works?
From the evidence I've seen, and the testimony I've heard, it seems like a crime has been committed. But the litmus test will be if the DOJ thinks so. Time will tell.
I think that's what the DOJ is trying to convince people of
How many months has the DOJ been "trying"?
I didn't realize that the DOJ had gotten involved until recently.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
