Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What about them being on the warrant? Were they there to gather absolutely 100% of everything they could get their hands on, or what was in the warrant?
ETA:
Your passport has more information in it than you DLs, so would you keep it in an unmarked box?
Barr or Sessions should or could have gone after her if they had chosen to.
I've said before, they should have. Whats stopping garland?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heron31
Absolutely not. One would think that all Americans would want to see anyone who commits a crime to be held accountable. Have Republicans and the far Right abandoned this principle? If not for Trump and his Big Lie about the election he lost, there would have been no attack on the U.S. Capitol. So isn't he responsible for that outrage? And now, it's pretty clear his little hands have been caught in the Top Secret cookie jar. Commit the crime, do the time, right? Let's see how this plays out.
What about them being on the warrant? Were they there to gather absolutely 100% of everything they could get their hands on, or what was in the warrant?
We don't know the contents of all the boxes they retrieved.
What about them being on the warrant? Were they there to gather absolutely 100% of everything they could get their hands on, or what was in the warrant?
ETA:
Your passport has more information in it than you DLs, so would you keep it in an unmarked box?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa
They probably took his diplomatic and government passports, which having lost the election, he had no right to possess any longer.
Top secret classified documents down to measley passports.
Major fail.
The Justice Department is opposing the release of details in an affidavit that lays out the argument that investigators made to a federal magistrate judge explaining the probable cause it had to search former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate last week.
In their new filing arguing for some continued secrecy, the Justice Department made clear the seriousness of the ongoing criminal investigation, saying it “implicates highly classified materials.”
“Disclosure of the government’s affidavit at this stage would also likely chill future cooperation by witnesses whose assistance may be sought as this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations,” the Justice Department wrote. “The fact that this investigation implicates highly classified materials further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential harm if information is disclosed to the public prematurely or improperly.”
Is the FBI denying it? Why would they not deny it if it was not true?
It's not for them to confirm or deny. At this point the only thing we do know is passports were not on the inventory list of items confiscated. I think it's just as telling that Trump's legal team hasn't (at this writing) filed some sort of objection or even a statement. Right now it's Trump and Trump alone making the accusation and, at this time, without supporting evidence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
