Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2022, 06:08 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,290,738 times
Reputation: 14274

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Every single Democrat in the US Senate voted against Rubio's amendment that pregnancy programs of the federal government should be limited to biological females by sex.

The self-proclaimed party of science says that pregnancy is not a process limited to biological females.

Transwomen that are biological males by sex, do not need to clog up limited resources, because of feelings about imaginary pregnancies that they can't have.
Can men breast feed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2022, 11:48 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,551 posts, read 10,973,619 times
Reputation: 10798
Hey all you liberals, still waiting for an answer to post #33
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 12:27 PM
 
8,227 posts, read 3,419,408 times
Reputation: 6094
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Every single Democrat in the US Senate voted against Rubio's amendment that pregnancy programs of the federal government should be limited to biological females by sex.

The self-proclaimed party of science says that pregnancy is not a process limited to biological females.

Transwomen that are biological males by sex, do not need to clog up limited resources, because of feelings about imaginary pregnancies that they can't have.
A female to male transgender who did NOT have "affirming" hormones and surgery can get pregnant. That is why you see advice at the CDC saying "pregnant people" should get covid vaccines, for example.

Because of the one in a million transgender person who identifies as male, but goes ahead with female reproduction processes anyway, the word "mother" and the phrase "pregnant woman" are now taboo.

WHY would a woman who identifies as male ever want to get pregnant and give birth?

Next thing you know, Democrats will try to pass a law against "Mother's Day" cards. They will all have to be changed to "People Who Gave Birth Day" cards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 12:34 PM
 
Location: NYC
6,661 posts, read 2,966,569 times
Reputation: 4493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good4Nothin View Post

WHY would a woman who identifies as male ever want to get pregnant and give birth?
Simple answer is we all know they believe men can get pregnant anyway.
They claim there is no distinction, yet use those same distinctions to justify grooming children to trans behavior.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Good4Nothin View Post
Next thing you know, Democrats will try to pass a law against "Mother's Day" cards. They will all have to be changed to "People Who Gave Birth Day" cards.
I would chuckle but the past decade has shown that most of the insane things we considered crazy have become reality in terms of what people are pushing and believing. I bet there are already people printing their own cards like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 12:35 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,548 posts, read 17,219,108 times
Reputation: 17582
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Every single Democrat in the US Senate voted against Rubio's amendment that pregnancy programs of the federal government should be limited to biological females by sex.

The self-proclaimed party of science says that pregnancy is not a process limited to biological females.

Transwomen that are biological males by sex, do not need to clog up limited resources, because of feelings about imaginary pregnancies that they can't have.
Dem senate is from an alien planet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,959 posts, read 75,174,114 times
Reputation: 66916
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Every single Democrat in the US Senate voted against Rubio's amendment that pregnancy programs of the federal government should be limited to biological females by sex.
Probably because it was stupid and unnecessary.

Quote:
The self-proclaimed party of science says that pregnancy is not a process limited to biological females.
That's not what it says at all. Think about it for a minute or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 01:31 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,725 posts, read 7,604,328 times
Reputation: 14998
Pregnancy is NOT a biologically female process


Is today "Opposites Day" or something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Madison, Alabama
12,971 posts, read 9,489,942 times
Reputation: 8957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good4Nothin View Post
A female to male transgender who did NOT have "affirming" hormones and surgery can get pregnant. That is why you see advice at the CDC saying "pregnant people" should get covid vaccines, for example.

Because of the one in a million transgender person who identifies as male, but goes ahead with female reproduction processes anyway, the word "mother" and the phrase "pregnant woman" are now taboo.

WHY would a woman who identifies as male ever want to get pregnant and give birth?

Next thing you know, Democrats will try to pass a law against "Mother's Day" cards. They will all have to be changed to "People Who Gave Birth Day" cards.

I'm going to head to the airport and identify as a pilot. Anybody want to come along and fly with me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 03:59 PM
 
3,325 posts, read 2,136,040 times
Reputation: 5154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
Can men breast feed?
Can't call it that any longer. It's now "chest feeding" according to the Orwellian Oracle types. They say so not only in government, but even in medical school. No more women, there are "birthing persons" and "menstruating persons," the latter of which will probably be clawed back shortly by the activists as well under some absurd theory of ableist bigotry or some such. It's so beyond comprehension how one side of the aisle appears to be completely taken by this sort of thing. Are there really no actual liberals remaining of the left-of-center variety?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2022, 04:06 PM
 
27,137 posts, read 15,310,658 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
What should we expect from the Party of Spite? They have tossed out common sense in favor of Feelings and they have manipulated Science to please themselves when it suits.



No matter how much you feel like a woman, act like a woman and even look like a woman you cannot bend nature. It is what it is.
It's all Sci-Fi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top