Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2022, 10:12 AM
 
26,494 posts, read 15,070,512 times
Reputation: 14643

Advertisements

Every single Democrat in the US Senate voted against Rubio's amendment that pregnancy programs of the federal government should be limited to biological females by sex.

The self-proclaimed party of science says that pregnancy is not a process limited to biological females.

Transwomen that are biological males by sex, do not need to clog up limited resources, because of feelings about imaginary pregnancies that they can't have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2022, 10:38 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,943,676 times
Reputation: 18149
Better post this in the Serena thread.

She thinks it's unfair that women have babies. Somebody needs to tell her she is mistaken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,490 posts, read 17,226,594 times
Reputation: 35782
What should we expect from the Party of Spite? They have tossed out common sense in favor of Feelings and they have manipulated Science to please themselves when it suits.



No matter how much you feel like a woman, act like a woman and even look like a woman you cannot bend nature. It is what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 10:49 AM
 
6,384 posts, read 2,707,824 times
Reputation: 6122
Did you expect any less?

You can say that it was a political stunt by Rubio because a Trans-Woman would never seek Pregnancy services so it doesn't need to be added.

But then again....a few years ago did we ever think that there would be a movement to call women "Birthing Persons"? That people would be fired over using the wrong "Pronoun". That woman would be told that men are allowed to compete against them in sports and use the same restrooms if they just "feel" like they are a woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 11:07 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,379 posts, read 60,561,367 times
Reputation: 60995
I taught a gay male student thirty years ago who was always talking about getting his period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
1,659 posts, read 1,242,149 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
I taught a gay male student thirty years ago who was always talking about getting his period.
Was that when his bowel disease flared up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 11:09 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
7,329 posts, read 3,804,222 times
Reputation: 5294
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Every single Democrat in the US Senate voted against Rubio's amendment that pregnancy programs of the federal government should be limited to biological females by sex.

The self-proclaimed party of science says that pregnancy is not a process limited to biological females.

Transwomen that are biological males by sex, do not need to clog up limited resources, because of feelings about imaginary pregnancies that they can't have.
The women wanted this. Let them deal with the consequences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,224,761 times
Reputation: 28324
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Every single Democrat in the US Senate voted against Rubio's amendment that pregnancy programs of the federal government should be limited to biological females by sex.

The self-proclaimed party of science says that pregnancy is not a process limited to biological females.

Transwomen that are biological males by sex, do not need to clog up limited resources, because of feelings about imaginary pregnancies that they can't have.
Yes, men can't have babies. We know that and Rubio probably does as well. Which is exactly why this stupid amendment by Rubio was unnecessary political posturing that makes a farce of the legislation and should be voted down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 11:17 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,379 posts, read 60,561,367 times
Reputation: 60995
Quote:
Originally Posted by detachable arm View Post
Was that when his bowel disease flared up?
No. He was a very strange individual in any event.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
Yes, men can't have babies. We know that and Rubio probably does as well. Which is exactly why this stupid amendment by Rubio was unnecessary political posturing that makes a farce of the legislation and should be voted down.
Oh?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5oMXuwv4b0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 11:22 AM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,823 posts, read 24,902,718 times
Reputation: 28518
So ya, in a given population, half the people are more stupid than the other half... And since it is a "government for the people, by the people" democrats insist on finding people of the stupider half, and electing them to positions where they can have the greatest influence and impact. Knowing this put everything else well into perspective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top