Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What's confusing is how you can just blow off six and a half million people dead from this global pandemic. Did you develop your personal philosophy from Mad Magazine -- What me worry?
Where's the "double"? There's only one global pandemic, which justified the taking of certain measures in the interest of public health and survival that would otherwise be objectionable. BTW, it's pretty outlandish to hear someone say, essentially, "Ah, big deal. Who cares about six and a half million dead people?" Wow.
“It's a private company and this is the United States, not Russia.”
You don’t see your hypocrisy on full display? “Public health and survival” for over a 99% survival rate? Yup, sounds like you are an authoritarian that will justify any violation of rights as the regime tickles your ears.
You know what’s outlandish? Your math skills as in the same time period other diseases and causes of death surpassed your over 99% survival rate for the Wuhan flu.
The fact authoritarians need to justify their double standards is the real “wow” here.
But it was in the interest of public health! Cue the worlds smallest violin...
Remember the Germans in the 30s used the same excuses to justify their propaganda for “public health.”
The sheer hypocrisy and mental gymnastics that one needs to use to backtrack their false premise is pathetic, isn’t it? Nicely done proving the hypocrisy and double standards these fascist types engage in.
Where's the "double"? There's only one global pandemic, which justified the taking of certain measures in the interest of public health and survival that would otherwise be objectionable. BTW, it's pretty outlandish to hear someone say, essentially, "Ah, big deal. Who cares about six and a half million dead people?" Wow.
This is not about a microscopic virus that most people don’t even know they have (estimates for the original WuFlu are 40-60% of cases are asymptomatic).
This is about government strong arming a private corporation to ban someone from tweeting. Think about how ridiculous that is for a second. Then think about this: everything Berenson in that tweet was accurate! If you listened to Berenson vs the CDC you’d get more accurate information.
Why is the government so scared of competing ideas if the truth is on their side?
Where's the "double"? There's only one global pandemic, which justified the taking of certain measures in the interest of public health and survival that would otherwise be objectionable. BTW, it's pretty outlandish to hear someone say, essentially, "Ah, big deal. Who cares about six and a half million dead people?" Wow.
Please enumerate the measures that were taken globally - that is, which every country followed in concert.
Individual "survival" was limited to approximately 1 in 5 people - those over 65 with immune-compromised bodies and other younger people with severe immune system issues.
If you're intimating it was for "public survival", well then you've gotten bad info.
If it truly was a global emergency, then the vaccines would have been distributed equally globally. To those for whom it was an important medicine.
For the people asking about the source, I didn't watch the video in the OP so maybe it was mentioned there, and has probably already been posted in the intervening pages, but Berenson is the source. He's got a substack article on it and he brought receipts.
He also mentioned that it came out that other reporters were asking for him to be banned, too, and said that he'd be reporting on those later.
There's a two-word explanation for that -- global pandemic.
Not to get too far off topic, but pandemics have happened in the past and the "lockdown" strategy was never a part of them. It was nonsense backed up by nothing. We can speculate and argue motives until the cows come home, but the objective facts are that the response had no basis in history or science, and had disastrous effects on society and the economy. It doesn't explain anything. It just creates more questions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
