Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2022, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
2,912 posts, read 1,242,758 times
Reputation: 4314

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haksel257 View Post
First you would have to define that word. Then you would have to predict the future, and/or attribute causes to things with or without evidence.
THIS is your comment on the topic? This is known as a deflection. When people deflect, they generally support what is being held up to scrutiny but are afraid to come right out and say so. How about a real comment on the topic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2022, 03:47 PM
 
8,723 posts, read 4,991,408 times
Reputation: 21201
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
I don't get how anyone could be attracted to minors. It's disgusting.
Some are even attracted to the smell of minors hair......perverts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Ohio
1,884 posts, read 994,647 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkHammer View Post
THIS is your comment on the topic? This is known as a deflection. When people deflect, they generally support what is being held up to scrutiny but are afraid to come right out and say so. How about a real comment on the topic?
No, I mean it. The argument starts in bad faith when one makes such vague connotational comments like that at the very beginning. How many people support this out of the entire US population, really?

My question should reveal a lot. What is wokeness? It's my understanding that wokeness is originally to the understanding of USA's dark racist/prejudice history regarding slavery and its aftermath.

Does that lead to pedophilia?

Let's expand the definition: homosexual/bisexual people should have every right to sexual/romantic relations. Does that lead to pedophilia??

How about: USA is perhaps not the force-for-good country we were raised to believe via arguably propaganda, and has potentially committed war crimes, like many countries have throughout history? Does this line of thinking lead to... normalization of pedophilia???

Do you understand why I criticize the initial question now? It's not a pedophilia-induced deflection, I promise you. Let's define "wokeness" first".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,795 posts, read 6,366,001 times
Reputation: 9927
Minor attracted pedophiles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 04:04 PM
 
3,315 posts, read 1,946,917 times
Reputation: 3317
There's not enough deterrent for this despicable crime.
Pedophiles even admit that nothing would stop them so life in a prison factory so they can earn their keep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 04:06 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,902,269 times
Reputation: 18149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Those are some SERIOUS problem glasses!
It's the tipoff.

It's part of the costume. Anyone who is involved with LGBTQ, drag queen shows directed at children (NOT adults), pedophilia, inappropriate sex discussion with elementary school kids .... the list goes on and on.

They ALL wear oversized glasses.

It's like that all got the memo to dress alike.

For a group that is SO insistent that they are SO individual and unique and everyone needs to respect their individuality and uniqueness ... they all dress exactly the same and have the exact same opinions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 04:07 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,902,269 times
Reputation: 18149
Why don't we call them what they are?

Child rapists.

Keep it simple and accurate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 04:19 PM
 
8,090 posts, read 3,417,773 times
Reputation: 5609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
Minor attracted persons.......... THAT IS STUPID.

What is so wrong with calling someone what they are? The Dems have no problem calling a MAGA hat wearing stranger they see on the street a RACIST. That is pretty ugly.



MAP? They are Pedophiles, CHILD Molesters, they are sick and should be castrated if not thrown down a dark hole and left to rot. Better would be toss them into prison with the initials CM (Child Molester) tattooed on their foreheads and let prison justice take care of it.



It is just sick to target and sexualize the most innocent of our society.



What is it with the Dems that want to make the sexualization of children normal?
It is not sick. It is evil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 04:19 PM
 
7,109 posts, read 4,712,743 times
Reputation: 6455
This push to normalize pedophilia is a result of the garbage in the minds of our kids that colleges are churning out. It’s now a societal decline as these kids engage in real life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2022, 04:32 PM
 
Location: No Mask For Me This Time, Either
5,648 posts, read 5,069,518 times
Reputation: 6057
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaOfGrass View Post
I understand why people try to change terms in order to make them sound more positive or palatable, but I don't understand how it can possibly work. When language is uttered, I will experience an idea or mental image of something.

Like here, supposedly "minor-attracted persons" is a more positive term than "pedophile." Why? "Pedo-" refers to children, "-phile" refers to something you have an affinity for or are attracted to. So "pedophile" is referring to the fact that you are attracted to children. To me, the term "minor-attracted persons" is more immediately descriptive of what you are. It sounds even worse to me.

I read something from a poster here today that mentioned the term "person of color" or "POC." As the poster mentioned, calling someone a "colored person" is now racist but the newly accepted term is "POC," which is almost literally the same term, just in reverse!

"Normal" is sometimes frowned upon, and assumed to be derogatory, when in actuality is referring to being in the range of what most people/things are.

"Retarded" is not accepted, when it merely refers to being limited in some way. It changed to "handicapped" and now, unless I'm behind the times, is referred to as "challenged," which all mean the same thing. I mean, "fire-retardant" simply means that fire is limited as far as it can burn.

I understand and agree with the fact that people want to avoid being cruel, but words are there to describe something, and no matter how hard you try, you have to describe what the facts are, if you're going to be honest, anyway.
Progressives continually strive to change the language with the goal of changing how people think and how the world is perceived. They’ve changed the meaning of “marriage”, “family”, “man” and “woman”. Add in “migrant”. All to normalize the abnormal and legitimize the illegitimate and illegal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top