Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It just seems like he's flip-flopping, but he's always been a weasel. He's been taking every side of every issue, just in case, so later on he can say he actually suggested the opposite view as another possibility
Real time? How about in Oct 2019 the W.H.O. released and peer reviewed study, which looked at ten other studies over ten years. They found that masks were ineffective in preventing infection. Fauci echoed those findings for months, until the wearing of masks became politicized as a way to control populations. Now, after all the government has lost control, we are back to acknowledging the results of the W.H.O. study.
Real time with the Covid Pandemic, mask use and efficacy changed with the current variants. Any Oct. 2019 findings and recommendations were not real time and nor necessarily applicable.
Information, presented here, illustrates complete failure of Fauci's "reign of incompetence". Fauci has caused such tremendous damage throughout the past few years that it’s almost impossible to comprehend.
Real time with the Covid Pandemic, mask use and efficacy changed with the current variants. Any Oct. 2019 findings and recommendations were not real time and nor necessarily applicable.
No, the mask efficacy didn't change. Masks stop an infected person from sneezing or coughing spit and saliva onto people, but social distancing solved that. Even now we have studies coming out that are confirming the WHO report from in Oct 2019. An N-95 mask properly worn by an infected person has small effect, but not enough to have ever warranted a nation-wide mask mandate.
A letter from top-level doctors and researchers arguing against the effectiveness of indoor mask mandates, along with pushback from health departments, cities and business groups, possibly played a role in a surprise decision not to re-institute the mandate in Los Angeles County last month.
Dr. Fauci might, maybe, likely, probably, possibly, assumably, presumably, presumedly, supposably, supposedly, conceivably, perchance, perhaps be the most deceptive man that ever lived.
No, the mask efficacy didn't change. Masks stop an infected person from sneezing or coughing spit and saliva onto people, but social distancing solved that. Even now we have studies coming out that are confirming the WHO report from in Oct 2019. An N-95 mask properly worn by an infected person has small effect, but not enough to have ever warranted a nation-wide mask mandate.
A letter from top-level doctors and researchers arguing against the effectiveness of indoor mask mandates, along with pushback from health departments, cities and business groups, possibly played a role in a surprise decision not to re-institute the mandate in Los Angeles County last month.
I would agree that earlier in the Pandemic that distancing was more important than masks for the general population. But for high risks it may have been more important. Especially in concentrated medical facilities. Later on the Pandemic with the much more transmissible variants it began to make less difference. Mandates today make next to no sense elsewhere.
Medical quarantine works.
Can't stop the spread of ignorance though that prevails by the avg joe who thinks taking a first aide course makes them a doctor.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.