Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
PV does HOLD itself in the best of darkness in how it conjured up half baked stories.
twist it to fit the narrative.
There comes a time where its absolutely important to consider the source. and the message its putting out.
Best said by a defendant who won a case against PV in Federal court on Liable and wire tapping-
"Hopefully, the decision today will help to discourage Mr. O'Keefe and others from conducting these kind of political spy operations and publishing selectively edited, misleading videos in the future"-
PV does HOLD itself in the best of darkness in how it conjured up half baked stories.
twist it to fit the narrative.
There comes a time where its absolutely important to consider the source. and the message its putting out.
Best said by a defendant who won a case against PV in Federal court on Liable and wire tapping-
"Hopefully, the decision today will help to discourage Mr. O'Keefe and others from conducting these kind of political spy operations and publishing selectively edited, misleading videos in the future"-
Yes, we know PV edits their videos, just like the mainstream media. They are allowed to cut out stuff that is not related to the story. Who would sit through hours of audio waiting for the part that proves a point? It's called cutting to the chase.
You bring this point up in every thread PV is mentioned, and you get the same set of responses. We are all aware that lefties do not like PV and do not think it should have a right to exist and operate. We get it. But thankfully, people are capable of watching their videos and deciding for themselves without your "help" and guidance.
PV does HOLD itself in the best of darkness in how it conjured up half baked stories.
twist it to fit the narrative.
There comes a time where its absolutely important to consider the source. and the message its putting out.
Best said by a defendant who won a case against PV in Federal court on Liable and wire tapping-
"Hopefully, the decision today will help to discourage Mr. O'Keefe and others from conducting these kind of political spy operations and publishing selectively edited, misleading videos in the future"-
You didn't seem to mind when "selectively edited" video of Trump's words (during his presidency) were put out every other day by the "news" media, did you?
I don't live in Arizona but this election, has been making the news nationwide for some time now. Kari Lake has been on the news rather frequently, but I never see this Katie Hobbs other than a PBS interviews. Did Hobbs not do much campaigning in Arizona? I know she did not debate Lake, but I think she would have been better off if she did. If she hasn't been out and about like Lake has campaigning, then I don't see how Hobbs expects to have any chance at all in this election.
My guess is Lake will win in Arizona. She will probably get votes even from the voters, that don't agree with her Election Denial and her Abortion views. Simply because they feel lesser of two evils. Which seems to be a standard way of voting in this country for far to long.
Good Luck with your Arizona Election
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
