Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD
NPR? Seriously??
So...no fraud occurred in court?
If you notice Barr said "to date". If the FBI investigated like they said, they certainly didn't investigate thoroughly. Meanwhile, when the swing states investigated, they admitted they found problems.
How do you explain away all the irregularities? Explain in great detail.
|
Are you serious?
You trust Giuliani’s drug addict and and convicted felon witnesses but not the FBI and DOJ led by Trump appointees to Attorney General and FBI Director
***You still haven’t address my post about trumps lawyers denying fraud in court or republicans election officials. How do you explain this. I’ll number them for you ***
1)republican state election officials all testifying no election fraud occurred
2)Fox News and OAN aired retractions saying no fraud
3)Sydney Powell said no rational person would believe her fraud claims
4)Trump and his supporters lost 63 court cases many with republican judges in which Trumps own lawyers in open court said there was no election fraud even Giuliani and Sydney Powell deny fraud in court pleadings and in open court.
**trumps lawyers and affiliated lawyers deny fraud in court. Even Giuliani denied fraud in court ***
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/u...-lawsuits.html
Trump RNC lawyer in Arizona
attorney Kory Langhofer stressed the plaintiffs were "not alleging fraud" or "that anyone is stealing the election" — simply raising concerns about a "limited number of cases" involving "good faith errors."
Giuliani in Pennsylvania
And when Brann pressed Giuliani to explain why none of the specific legal claims in the suit are based on voter fraud, the president’s lawyer admitted the campaign isn’t pleading voter fraud at all. Later, Brann asked whether he should apply a higher legal standard of “strict scrutiny” to the case, which is required when fraud is alleged.
“If we had alleged fraud, then yes, but this is not a fraud case,” Giuliani said quickly.
Trump campaign lawyer Goldstein in Pennsylvania
“In your petition, which is right before me — and I read it several times — you don’t claim that any electors or the Board of the County were guilty of fraud, correct?” asked the judge. “That’s correct?”
“Your Honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,” Goldstein replied. “And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the DNC or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith. The DNC is coming with good faith. We’re all just trying to get an election done. We think these were a mistake, but we think they are a fatal mistake, and these ballots ought not be counted.”
“I understand,” he told Goldstein. “I am asking you a specific question, and I am looking for a specific answer. Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?”
“To my knowledge at present, no,” Goldstein said.
“Are you claiming that there is any undue or improper influence upon the elector with respect to these 592 ballots,” queried the judge.
“To my knowledge at present, no,” was Goldstein’s reply.
These are statements from court records and reported in the American Bar association journal
https://www.abajournal.com/news/arti...zero-admission