Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:06 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,440,773 times
Reputation: 10022

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
Northram describes the same process that would happen with any human being.

Someone dies. Resuscitate or not? Do they have a DNR? If yes, no resuscitation.

No DNR who holds the medical power of attorney. Some next of kin.

An example most people can understand. Your wife has a heart attack with no DNR. You the husband then become responsible to decide her treatment. In reality if you aren't there at that moment, they probably resuscitate her.

Once they resuscitate her, say she goes into a coma. Husband then decides put her on life support and keep her on it or not or let her die in peace.

Same with the child born in some sort of distress.

This is normal everyday medicine for everyone in the country. Why is anyone alarmed that a baby would be treated the same. Who should decide how much invasive treatment a baby should receive in the face of unlikely survival other than the parent(s) who love and want that child?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:08 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansible90 View Post
Where did you hear this nonsense?
probably here, for one.

Virginia Governor Northam Describes How Post-Birth Abortion Would Proceed
Quote:
NBC Washington’s Julie Carey asked Northam whether he supported a bill proposed by Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran (D), which would allow abortions--up to the moment of birth.

In response, Northam said that a baby born alive could be “kept comfortable” and then “resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired” – the implication being that the baby could be left to die if the family decided they did not want to keep their child.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:09 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,018,755 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
By your acknowledgement above that you understand what Gosnell has done, you are scknowledging that there are women who WANT to kill perfectly healthy babies just because they can up until and after birth. Just a matter off finding someone who will do it.


In spite of other posters emphatic and continued and WRONGFUL denial that it has never, ever happened in the history of the world.
The fear mongering comes not from finding one person at one time...but by spreading the ideas it happens frequently -- it doesn't.

Legalizing abortion drastically reduced the number of oppprtunities for criminal doctors or individuals.

Sending abortions back to alleys will not stop abortions, will in fact provide more opportunity for criminal like behavior.

IRealistically, the overwhelming majority of doctors would not perform a late term abortion just because the woman wants one.

It isn't a common occurence.



Banning all people from driving because some people may drive recklessly isn't how we do things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:10 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,945,609 times
Reputation: 18151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Northram describes the same process that would happen with any human being.

Someone dies. Resuscitate or not? Do they have a DNR? If yes, no resuscitation.

No DNR who holds the medical power of attorney. Some next of kin.

An example most people can understand. Your wife has a heart attack with no DNR. You the husband then become responsible to decide her treatment. In reality if you aren't there at that moment, they probably resuscitate her.

Once they resuscitate her, say she goes into a coma. Husband then decides put her on life support and keep her on it or not or let her die in peace.

Same with the child born in some sort of distress.

This is normal everyday medicine for everyone in the country. Why is anyone alarmed that a baby would be treated the same. Who should decide how much invasive treatment a baby should receive in the face of unlikely survival other than the parent(s) who love and want that child?
If a perfectly healthy baby survives abortion and needs medical care, is that baby 'allowed' to live?

Or do they let the baby die or worse kill the baby directly ... because abortion is more important than the baby's life?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:13 AM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,136 posts, read 19,722,567 times
Reputation: 25661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blondy View Post
Northram describes the same process that would happen with any human being.

Someone dies. Resuscitate or not? Do they have a DNR? If yes, no resuscitation.

No DNR who holds the medical power of attorney. Some next of kin.

An example most people can understand. Your wife has a heart attack with no DNR. You the husband then become responsible to decide her treatment. In reality if you aren't there at that moment, they probably resuscitate her.

Once they resuscitate her, say she goes into a coma. Husband then decides put her on life support and keep her on it or not or let her die in peace.

Same with the child born in some sort of distress.

This is normal everyday medicine for everyone in the country. Why is anyone alarmed that a baby would be treated the same. Who should decide how much invasive treatment a baby should receive in the face of unlikely survival other than the parent(s) who love and want that child?
It is common for completely healthy babies to be born not breathing. That is why they hold them upside down and spank them.

Big difference from a heart attack victim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:15 AM
 
585 posts, read 495,481 times
Reputation: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
But if you watch the video he says if if was r a viable fetus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Hillsboro Beach
1,641 posts, read 1,646,117 times
Reputation: 1562
What a question !!!
Don't you remember what Hillary Clinton said in her debate with Trump in 2016 regarding to abortion at the very minute a criature is coming out ? She literally agreed ! and many Americans are willing to take her bullet yet in defense of that human massacre.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:17 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,945,609 times
Reputation: 18151
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
The fear mongering comes not from finding one person at one time...but by spreading the ideas it happens frequently -- it doesn't.

Legalizing abortion drastically reduced the number of oppprtunities for criminal doctors or individuals.

Sending abortions back to alleys will not stop abortions, will in fact provide more opportunity for criminal like behavior.

IRealistically, the overwhelming majority of doctors would not perform a late term abortion just because the woman wants one.

It isn't a common occurence.

Banning all people from driving because some people may drive recklessly isn't how we do things.
Your post is confusing.

You want to allow it because you think it doesn't happen enough to matter? Am I understanding your argument correctly?

Why not outlaw it? Why is making it illegal to kill perfectly healthy babies such a THREAT that it cannot be made illegal?

There are no back alley abortions. If that isn't fear porn, I don't know what is. Women weren't lying in gutters by the millions bleeding out from illegal abortions.

In fact I have NEVER seen any pictures of that. You'd think with 5 decades of abortion debate these would be circulating EVERYWHERE.

Not. A. One.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Western PA
10,857 posts, read 4,534,722 times
Reputation: 6717
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
The fear mongering comes not from finding one person at one time...but by spreading the ideas it happens frequently -- it doesn't.

Legalizing abortion drastically reduced the number of oppprtunities for criminal doctors or individuals.

Sending abortions back to alleys will not stop abortions, will in fact provide more opportunity for criminal like behavior.

IRealistically, the overwhelming majority of doctors would not perform a late term abortion just because the woman wants one.

It isn't a common occurence.



Banning all people from driving because some people may drive recklessly isn't how we do things.

yea but this is a non starter, abortion is NEVER going to be outlawed, regardless who is on the ballot or gets in. Oh but some counties in oklahoma blah blah blah. so?


access to abortion will never be criminal. its at best a local issue, like, well a crap ton of other ones.


the dems control every branch of govt needed to codify it TOMORROW. The USSC even said if they would codify it they would be grateful so they never have to have the convo again.


Pelosi and Schumer wont even bring a bill to the floor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2022, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,959 posts, read 75,205,836 times
Reputation: 66918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mco65 View Post
This is the story that killed it for me
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
probably here, for one.
You're all engaging in selective reading. Can't say I'm surprised.

Here's what Northam actually said (from the link provided above). Note the emphasis on (graf 1) and reference to (graf 2) the viability of the fetus:

Quote:
“There are, you know, when we talk about third trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians – more than one physician, by the way – and it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that’s non-viable.

“So, in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top