Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
...the ones that are not doing back flips making excuses for China
like you are...........
That does not mean nor is proof the other side is righteous, and honest. I could very well be a Chinese Ministry of State Security Agent (if that is what its called like in the movies). But it still does not mean the other side is not just as dishonest.
That does not mean nor is proof the other side is righteous, and honest. I could very well be a Chinese Ministry of State Security Agent (if that is what its called like in the movies). But it still does not mean the other side is not just as dishonest.
why don't you try using google....see what you find using "China coal plants"
LOL I simply stated reports of China going green or trying to go green. Then you say those sources are liberal sources not worth a dam. Googling for more sources does not solve that dilemma of which side to believe.
Plus here is another possibly scenario. What if they are building new coal plants, to replace the old ones after they are torn down. So basically these new ones are upgrades with better tech, less emissions, and more efficiency. Perhaps they are doing that too overseas, as I am reading from your article, they are building new ones around the world.
Poor countries should be thankful we let them use the technology we invented. If they are ungrateful and we need to cut emissions, just take it away from them
Poor countries should be thankful we let them use the technology we invented. If they are ungrateful and we need to cut emissions, just take it away from them
I hope you don't include China in your "poor countries" list here.....you wont get very far trying that tactic on China.
Especially when China's green house gasses have gone nothing but up, while the West have have gone down for the last 20 years.
Easy to say when the west already has a head start. What do you think the west's stance would be if they were playing catchup?
On a per capita basis, we are far worse with our SFH in the suburbs that require us to drive everywhere in our SUVs with just one occupant driving in congested traffic getting MPG in the teens. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-em...ns-per-capita/
Easy to say when the west already has a head start. What do you think the west's stance would be if they were playing catchup?
On a per capita basis, we are far worse with our SFH in the suburbs that require us to drive everywhere in our SUVs with just one occupant driving in congested traffic getting MPG in the teens. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-em...ns-per-capita/
Wow, Brazil and Mexico are pretty good per capita emissions. And they population are quite high. I guess Mexico has less land to cover. But Brazil is a large country too. Is it because they are bio fuel based? Its what I heard about Brazil.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
