Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, the seditious left has been saying exactly this for six years.
Do you support Garland appointing a special counsel to investigate the Biden crime family? After all, if they did nothing wrong, they have nothing to worry about. Right?
I think some government authorities should start investigating you. After all, if you did nothing wrong no big deal. Have fun paying your legal fees!
Special Counsels are not appointed unless there is existing evidence of criminal activity. If you have the evidence, then absolutely I support any and all investigations and prosecutions if they are found guilty.
And don't forget the most important aspect of these special counsels, to destroy the people who dare to associate with Trump, now, or in the past.
Once again, anyone associated with Trump will be dragged into this process. They will be forced to empty their life savings, take out loans, sell their homes, just to hire attorneys to protect them from being tossed in prison for lame asses process crime traps, unless they tell black lies, gray lies and white lies, then sign prepared statements to those lies.
So what you are saying here is associating with Trump could end up bankrupting you. That's an important lesson. Thank you. I will avoid all future contact with him.
I agree wth Pence. These are just smokesreens to provide cover for the numerous Biden family crimes, where evidence has already been collected. Don't let them deflect away from the 2nd most important investigation..the one into the Bidens.
#1 is the covid 19 investigations, but thats another topic....Millions died remember?
Then why is Pence refusing to testify and clear his former boss and running buddy? He, as a lawyer and a former governor and VP should certainly understand that the quickest way for the matter to clear up and go away is for him to tell the truth under oath, since he was an eyewitness to and a participant in the events under investigation.
Special Counsels are not appointed unless there is existing evidence of criminal activity. If you have the evidence, then absolutely I support any and all investigations and prosecutions if they are found guilty.
Do you not support the same thing for Trump?
There is an entire laptop full of evidence. There is the testimony of Tony Bobulinski. There are records of Biden bank accounts being flagged by the IRS over 150 times. There is the public record of Biden threatening Ukrainian officials.
There is so much "evidence" in the public domain, it's shocking that someone with any intelligence or awareness would actually ask for it.
Oh, and since when is evidence required before appointing a special prosecutor? Democrats never had any evidence of Russian collusion, yet Mueller was appointed.
There is an entire laptop full of evidence. There is the testimony of Tony Bobulinski. There are records of Biden bank accounts being flagged by the IRS over 150 times. There is the public record of Biden threatening Ukrainian officials.
There is so much "evidence" in the public domain, it's shocking that someone with any intelligence or awareness would actually ask for it.
Oh, and since when is evidence required before appointing a special prosecutor? Democrats never had any evidence of Russian collusion, yet Mueller was appointed.
Well Muller said Trump should have been charged with obstruction. As the Sitting POTUS he could not have been charged.
Dunham found nothing other than a lawyer admitting he changed a sentence.
So now that Trump is out of office, he continued to obstruct in multiple investigations. Privilege is gone for Trump so he should be charged and brought to trial.
DOJ has all the work done, Special Council just needs to check on work and sign off on charges (if any).
when is the usag going to investigate biden for breach of national security. As if mayorkas was not enough evidence of corruption and failing to protect the country!
to investigate trump and not go after the fbi and democrats and media heads is pure political revenge conducted by a corrupt DOJ
... Democrats never had any evidence of Russian collusion, yet Mueller was appointed.
Mueller was appointed by a Republican which was part of the Trump administration. Why are you trying to rewrite history and blame Dems?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
