Gregg Jarrett says policy allowing invasion is not high crime or misdemeanor (illegal, impeachment)

[WRM20]

Originally Posted by johnwk1

(A)Any person who—

Are you trying to say that the Federal government doesn't get to decide who is here illegally or legally? And, from everything I've seen, the aliens being transported around the country have been granted legal entry into the US as part of their asylum claim.

[WRM20]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

And the feds have already determined who is an illegal alien so all of those people from mostly south of our border who snuck into our country are illegal aliens and those who overstay their visas become likewise.

When found, those are the ones that get deported pretty quickly. The aliens being transported around the country are here legally, usually under an asylum claim.

[SunGrins]

OP's assertion of a "high misdemeanor" based on comments made during a 1790 debate carries as much weight as -- nothing.

[Roboteer]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

there's invasion and there's armed invasion.

there's a reason why we don't have US Marines and 82nd Airborne Division at the southern border to shoot the invaders on sight

Yet.

[TMSRetired]

Folks...we have defacto open borders.

The government welcomes them, transports them wherever they want, provides housing, food, clothing, medicine and even a monthly allowance.


These illegals are getting treated better then homeless Americans ever were.

The FedGov found out it can do whatever it wants and no one can stop them.

[Roboteer]

Originally Posted by SunGrins

OP's assertion of a "high misdemeanor" based on comments made during a 1790 debate carries as much weight as -- nothing.

The usual groundless wishful thinking from the usual liberal fanatics.

The definitions of "high crimes and misdemeanors" have not changed since 1789.

"Crime" means, something that broke a law.

"Demeanor" means "behavior".

"Misdemeanor" means bad behavior. Doesn't have to be something that broke a law.

"High crimes and misdemeanors" means crimes and/or bad behavior in high office. Judges, cabinet secretaries, Prez, VP etc.

Judges have been impeached (and successfully removed) for regularly showing up drunk on the bench (see "Alcee Hastings", and a few others). No laws were broken. But they were booted anyway. It was a case of "high misdemeanor".

The boss of Homeland Security's basic job is to make sure U.S. laws about legal immigration and border crossings are upheld and enforced.

And if he, for example, instead lets illegal aliens flow across any old where they wanted in any old quantities they want, in direct violation of U.S. laws that require they cross only at official border check point stations and in only certain quantities (see "quotas") after receiving an official U.S. visa....

...in fact, the boss of Homeland Security is himself breaking the law. And he is freely letting the illegal aliens break the law. He is guilty of BOTH a "high crime" and "high misdemeanor".

He can, and should be, impeached and removed. He's not doing the job he hired on for. What reason could we possibly have to keep him in that job?

The only possible reason, is because the people in high office like what he's doing just fine, regardless of its fraudulent nature and lawbreaking.

BTW, I can think of another job ("high office") where the occupant takes an oath that includes "....to take care that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed". And that occupant is the boss of the boss of Homeland Security. He too is violating his oath.

If that's not "high misdemeanor", what is?

[Kracer]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

there's invasion and there's armed invasion.

there's a reason why we don't have US Marines and 82nd Airborne Division at the southern border to shoot the invaders on sight

Pelosi used 26 K troops to surround DC to prevent an imaginary invasion. Imaginary guns, imaginary white supremacists, imaginary insurrectionists.....other than the dems and intel agencies

an invasion of locusts
an invasion of fruit flies
don't need arms to invade, ask the jan 6th kangaroo court.

Impeach based on breech of national security!!!!!!

Impeach based on leading cause of fentanyl deaths

impeach based on the lie that the border is secure

[TMSRetired]

Originally Posted by Kracer

Pelosi used 26 K troops to surround DC to prevent an imaginary invasion. Imaginary guns, imaginary white supremacists, imaginary insurrectionists.....other than the dems and intel agencies

an invasion of locusts
an invasion of fruit flies
don't need arms to invade, ask the jan 6th kangaroo court.

Impeach based on breech of national security!!!!!!

Impeach based on leading cause of fentanyl deaths

impeach based on the lie that the border is secure

The Dems hosted an insurrection and only the FBI showed up.
I remember that one

[Floorist]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

name a corporations that hire illegal aliens. Facebook? Target? Walmart?

Tyson foods, Butterball, etc.

[johnwk1]

Originally Posted by Oldglory

And the feds have already determined who is an illegal alien so all of those people from mostly south of our border who snuck into our country are illegal aliens and those who overstay their visas become likewise.

Our bordering states with Mexico need to exercise their original policing powers which includes rejecting, expelling and even jailing unwanted foreign nationals who cross the State's border without permission.