Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Which ones do you want to impeach or go after? I assume you mean the entire Congress and Presidents for the last 50 years at minimum but likely more if we follow the logic of the OP.
We could do some "impeachments from the grave" and get Reagan and Bush 1 also, don't let a mere issue like DEATH stop you.
It is utterly shameful to ignore and cleverly make fun of 5 million foreign nationals swarming across our border in the past two years.
When found, those are the ones that get deported pretty quickly. The aliens being transported around the country are here legally, usually under an asylum claim.
Yeah, statistically 80% of them are making bogus claims and that's why we should not allow them into our country before their claims can be verified.
Yeah, statistically 80% of them are making bogus claims and that's why we should not allow them into our country before their claims can be verified.
Biden has stopped border Agents from conducting “credible fear” screening at the border, which the Trump Administration did, and immediately rejected foreigners making these bogus asylum claims.
name a corporations that hire illegal aliens. Facebook? Target? Walmart?
The contractors that clean Target got into deep ... a couple years back for using illegals. That's the beauty of contracting. Everybody can say they had no idea so and so was doing that.
That's not how the law works, especially when we are short of immigration courts to handle the cases.
So how does that change by allowing them into our country before their case are verified? We'd still be short of judges to handle their cases only the drawback would be that they in the meantime be allowed to roam around our country for the taxpayer to care for and many of them don't even show up for their court dates anyway because they know they were making bogus claims.
So how does that change by allowing them into our country before their case are verified? We'd still be short of judges to handle their cases only the drawback would be that they in the meantime be allowed to roam around our country for the taxpayer to care for and many of them don't even show up for their court dates anyway because they know they were making bogus claims.
Then where do they stay while waiting for their asylum claim to be adjudicated?
So how does that change by allowing them into our country before their case are verified? We'd still be short of judges to handle their cases only the drawback would be that they in the meantime be allowed to roam around our country for the taxpayer to care for and many of them don't even show up for their court dates anyway because they know they were making bogus claims.
"Originally Posted by WRM20That's not how the law works, especially when we are short of immigration courts to handle the cases."
If we enforced our laws, there would NOT be such large caseload in the first place!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
