Must Every Article Sound Climate Alarms? (ethics, legal, Christmas, racism)

[jbgusa]

This article struck me, from its title Meet the Mice Who Make the Forest - Scientists are unearthing a quiet truth about the woods: Where trees grow, or don’t, depends in part on the quirky decisions of small mammals to be an intriguing nature article, harking back to my childhood days of hanging out at the local nature center. Then, why must every article on nature, weather, hiking or almost everything raise climate alarms. Excerpt:

"If one is interested in the future of a forest — which tree species will thrive and which will diminish, or whether those threatened by a fast-changing climate will successfully migrate to newly hospitable lands — one should look to these seed-dispersing animals."

It is super-annoying at best, propangandistic at worst. It has to stop.

[Kristinas_Cap]

I started looking at all the stuff through a different lens lately. sure we all can agree that the climate doesn’t stay constant, so why should we care? It’s not like we will ever get a handle on a moving target unless human beings cease to exist.

[uggabugga]

Originally Posted by jbgusa

This article struck me, from its title Meet the Mice Who Make the Forest - Scientists are unearthing a quiet truth about the woods: Where trees grow, or don’t, depends in part on the quirky decisions of small mammals to be an intriguing nature article, harking back to my childhood days of hanging out at the local nature center. Then, why must every article on nature, weather, hiking or almost everything raise climate alarms. Excerpt:

"If one is interested in the future of a forest — which tree species will thrive and which will diminish, or whether those threatened by a fast-changing climate will successfully migrate to newly hospitable lands — one should look to these seed-dispersing animals."

It is super-annoying at best, propangandistic at worst. It has to stop.

the comPost can work 'climate change' into any story, no matter the subject.

[Nodpete]

Climate change is like telling a lie over and over (think politics) . Sooner or later people will start believing it to be the truth.

[Trekker99]

Hanoi Jane (Fonda) just recently blamed the climate crisis on racism and misogyny.

Just as everything used to be racist, now everything will be blamed for "the climate crisis" - brought to you by Dems and ESG cultists as the new and improved existential crisis to control our lives.

[DannyHobkins]

Its in every article, and documentary. Thats how you know its indoctrination, and not real.

[remco67]

Dont be dramatic, some articles talk about Trump and how "we've got him now"

[paracord]

It's like religion or santa claus.

"Be good, or else!"

It's just a way to control the masses. This is the liberals way of doing that since they don't believe in religion or christmas.

[swagger]

There are lots of reasons for that.

For most, it's a cult. Cult members proselytize - that's part of being in a cult. These are the 'true believer' types. They believe what they're told and act how they're expected to act.

For some, it's economic. The "green" movement is a massive, massive industry. Promoting climate alarmism is good for anyone who stands to gain from it.

And at the top of the pyramid are the regulators/politicians/global leaders. They do it ("How dare you!") because anyone can be forced to do (or not do) anything in the name of "the climate crisis." You'll live in the pod, eat the bugs, own nothing and be happy. I promise.

[Angel Calzadilla]

A society that only demands infrastructure or public services and leaves the rest in the hands of ideologues and social engineers is doomed to failure. You will not get quality either in the institutions or in the benefits.
On the contrary, the people that maintains the tension of the spirit and forces power to ethics is the only one that has a chance of not becoming a slave. But it is already known, in the socialist DNA, it is written that the legal framework will only be respected when it suits their interests, and the flaccid right has never been able to defend its original legitimacy.