Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,119,613 times
Reputation: 15135

Advertisements

"Only the police should have guns, because they're the people who have training and can be trusted to be responsible with them."

This is the general response from the gun control crowd when challenged about why police should be exempt from whatever gun law is at issue. (Police are exempt almost universally from gun control).

The position seems like common sense, but "common sense" is nothing but shared beliefs. There's nothing magical or unique which differentiates a police officer from any other human being. They're imperfect people, just like you and me, and they can be corrupted and make mistakes, just like you and me. Training can help, but it can't eliminate that reality.

People who don't get paid to carry guns can complete training, too, yet we never see exemptions for private citizens who've undergone that process - just police. When it comes to guns, police officers are a special class of citizen and get to enjoy their rights while the rest of us suffer the tyranny.

Here's one of those highly trained police officers demonstrating the responsibility which has earned them the near full enjoyment of their rights, while the rest of us have to worry about whether or not we just became felons overnight because some new law was passed.

Florida deputy killed when his roommate, a fellow deputy, "jokingly" fires gun he thought was unloaded, sheriff says

This isn't an anti-police post, by the way. Reading it over, it kind of has that tone. It's quite the opposite, actually. My beef is with the people who define the rules. Police officers are mere mortals is my point, and if they can be trusted with X weapon or feature, then so can you or I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:35 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
5,044 posts, read 2,401,207 times
Reputation: 3590
Many places with bans on guns do not allow the police to have guns either. This is what most people who want guns banned are shooting for. Pardon the pun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:38 PM
 
Location: My house
7,375 posts, read 3,536,587 times
Reputation: 7770
in the near future, police will not need guns in the traditional way as immobilization technologies which are currently in development will be used. not tasers or stun guns either
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:39 PM
 
5,222 posts, read 3,018,225 times
Reputation: 7022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristinas_Cap View Post
in the near future, police will not need guns in the traditional way as immobilization technologies which are currently in development will be used. not tasers or stun guns either
Care to explain more of what you are talking about? I am intrigued.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:40 PM
 
6,348 posts, read 2,901,596 times
Reputation: 7289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristinas_Cap View Post
in the near future, police will not need guns in the traditional way as immobilization technologies which are currently in development will be used. not tasers or stun guns either
What? Everyone gets a chip implanted in their heads and the cops can zap you unconscious with a remote?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:41 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
5,044 posts, read 2,401,207 times
Reputation: 3590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristinas_Cap View Post
in the near future, police will not need guns in the traditional way as immobilization technologies which are currently in development will be used. not tasers or stun guns either
I was thinking the other day about that. It seems like should you get a shooter in Walmart, at some point in the future their will be counter measures. Like if gunfire is detected a pulse or stun wave of some sort is set off. Incapacitating everybody inside but not lethal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:47 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristinas_Cap View Post
in the near future, police will not need guns in the traditional way as immobilization technologies which are currently in development will be used. not tasers or stun guns either
For two quick examples, look at the Chinese and Canadian govt’s and how they un-person any citizenry that displeases them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:49 PM
 
8,943 posts, read 2,967,178 times
Reputation: 5168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristinas_Cap View Post
in the near future, police will not need guns in the traditional way as immobilization technologies which are currently in development will be used. not tasers or stun guns either
Yep, and all cars will be electric.

And our money will all be crypto.

Yep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:50 PM
 
8,943 posts, read 2,967,178 times
Reputation: 5168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
For two quick examples, look at the Chinese and Canadian govt’s and how they un-person any citizenry that displeases them
And part of that process is draconian guns laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2022, 12:53 PM
 
1,665 posts, read 975,968 times
Reputation: 3065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristinas_Cap View Post
in the near future, police will not need guns in the traditional way as immobilization technologies which are currently in development will be used. not tasers or stun guns either
Are you referring the robots in San Francisco?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top