Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2023, 04:41 AM
 
20,319 posts, read 21,171,209 times
Reputation: 17074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Like when cutting spending never seems to decrase the deficit when Republicans are in office.
Laughable.
The democrats have put us in such a hole that trying to shrink the deficit is like trying to empty the ocean with a bucket. Plus, republicans have not been consistently in power in long enough stretches to make a noticeable difference. So, yes, this is all on the democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2023, 05:03 AM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
26,481 posts, read 13,321,307 times
Reputation: 19954
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirage98de View Post
Fire 25% of federal government employees.

If everything holds together after that, fire 25% more.

End every dime being sent to any foreign country for any reason.

I agree with very aggressive headcount reduction for the Feds...DC's grossly overbloated.

I like same % across-the-board cuts because it reduces the months/yrs of bickering on what to cut...our time is up on overspending.

Some will argue that <1% of our annual budget goes to foreign aid, but that is still $63B not going to help SS.

Also, the $63B doesn't include the $'s we spend defending other countries all around the globe, which is a much larger amout than the $63B. We've sent $50B+ in military stuff to Ukraine in yr 1 of their Putin war.

That $113B would sure look nice in our SS trust fund account.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 05:33 AM
 
24,231 posts, read 15,297,372 times
Reputation: 13128
Anybody who put a yellow ribbon sticker on their car is responsible for the 2+ trillion dollar part of the debt due to invading Iraq.

Don't be coming back at me with but Hillary voted for it, too. What would have been the response to any politician who said no Dick Cheney? It was nothing but a get even for 9-11. Why didn't we go after Saudi Arabia?

Calculate all the interest that borrowed money war will cost. Now figure in the wounded. How much will their care cost?

Most people in my state can't stand the federal government. But they darn sure have their hands out when a storm hits. FEMA and all the other federal hand outs are never rejected due to deficit financing.

But then, who told us deficits don't matter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 06:24 AM
 
22,710 posts, read 24,788,858 times
Reputation: 20461
Much of Fedgov's spending is under the umbrella of "touch it and you are starving granny", so just forget that part as ever being eligible for any cuts.

The rest, well, good luck cutting it.........screams of protest will erupt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 06:49 AM
 
11,415 posts, read 7,878,484 times
Reputation: 21938
Quote:
Originally Posted by albert648 View Post
Yet, the "right", whatever that means, donates 30% more as a percentage of their income than the left.

God forbid you have to **** away your own money.
Charity has never and will never replace a social safety network.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 06:59 AM
 
9,670 posts, read 4,450,405 times
Reputation: 10793
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotkarl View Post
Vote democrat!
Good one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 07:10 AM
 
13,864 posts, read 5,080,266 times
Reputation: 9905
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotkarl View Post
Laughable.
The democrats have put us in such a hole that trying to shrink the deficit is like trying to empty the ocean with a bucket. Plus, republicans have not been consistently in power in long enough stretches to make a noticeable difference. So, yes, this is all on the democrats.
The deficit has never been reduced when Republicans were in charge. Spending never goes down when Republicans are in charge. They only reduce taxes, which puts us more in debt. This is definitely a bipartisan problem.

But only 25 years ago, with a Democrat President and Republican Congress, we had a surplus for 4 glorious years. Why not go back to the budget of 2000, adjusted for inflation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 07:19 AM
 
8,181 posts, read 2,830,420 times
Reputation: 6016
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
Charity has never and will never replace a social safety network.
A social safety has never successfully provided anything in the way of social safety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 07:34 AM
 
24,231 posts, read 15,297,372 times
Reputation: 13128
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
Much of Fedgov's spending is under the umbrella of "touch it and you are starving granny", so just forget that part as ever being eligible for any cuts.

The rest, well, good luck cutting it.........screams of protest will erupt.
A 10% budget cut would probably not be felt by most organizations. Those families/households already on the edge would feel it the most.

Just declare a 10% budget cut for all government departments. They can lay off some people.

Maybe the Texas highway department can look at the contractors they are hiring. We have been in a construction zone for 8 years. Watching every day we see one guy with a shovel in a hole in the ground while 4-7 guys watch. That's 24/7/365.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2023, 07:38 AM
 
15,778 posts, read 7,807,293 times
Reputation: 19656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
There are 195 countries in the world and we provide aid to 157. Why? We can't afford it.
The amount of foreign aid has been around $40 billion per year for a long time. That money buys a lot of good will, gives the US influence, and creates jobs for Americans. that's right, jobs for Americans. The foreign aid money, other than some cash that goes to Israel and Egypt, generally provides infrastructure and similar projects. Those projects are done by US companies. When we lived in Egypt in the early 90's, the US was funding the installation of 2 million telephone lines in Cairo. The project was done by AT&T, and all of the project management and supervision was done by Americans. The amount of goodwill from that project was huge, as it eliminated the 5 to 10 year backlog for Egyptians to get a phone line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top