Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It looks like this person wanted others to accept the body without questioning. It seems to me in this person's mind, bottom does not define a woman, top does. =)
It is also kind of sad that this person thinks the men who date this person are "cis gender straight men." lol
It’s really confusing. They are legitimately mentally ill. A “woman” with a penis, I’ve heard it all now.
Well, she's right. The person is s male, and it's not illegal for a man to go without a shirt in public. But does that mean she doesn't believe a man can become a woman just because they want to? That kinda goes against the party line.
Right, to say it’s a man so it’s fine is clearly stating that this is not a woman at all. The left has circular logic and uses semantics to manipulate the masses.
Eh, so what if some lady showed her boobs in public. I'm sure parks and beaches in Europe have much "worse" all the time. It's not like they've collapsed into an apocalyptic hellscape on account of it.
Why not? If they fought for freedom to own property and make a legitimate and honorable profit from it (among other things), then why exclude the freedom for people to pursue different lifestyle choices - so long as they're not illegitimate and dishonorable? Put another way, the US is a democracy, not a conformist aesthetocracy
That’s not the point. At all. It’s a family event at a govt building and they were there as invited guests. It’s not a topless beach in Europe.
Right, to say it’s a man so it’s fine is clearly stating that this is not a woman at all. The left has circular logic and uses semantics to manipulate the masses.
Although, to be fair, this reasoning works both ways. There were transmen who were exposing their bare chests in the same shot as Montoya, but there's no outrage about that.
Sure, chicken doesn't want extremely painful bottom surgery. Once the faux vagina is constructed it must be constantly (daily to several times a day) dilated, which is extremely painful. If not dilated the wound heals and the faux vagina remains closed.
Intercourse is also VERY VERY VERY painful!
Before I retired, we worked with a transitioned F to M who was very open in talking with co-workers. Said it was the biggest he ever made in his life. Had problems getting a relationship with men. When they did, it was usually very short term
This actually makes a lot of sense with regard to how depressed and miserable they are even after transitioning. The ones who use puberty blockers never develop mature sexual organs, and the adults who do it, it just would never be the same once the original parts are missing and fake ones are put in their place. On top of it, most people just think they’re freaks and don’t want to date them or have a long term relationship. In contrast to the young people, these do know what they’re missing and once it’s gone, it’s gone.
Although, to be fair, this reasoning works both ways. There were transmen who were exposing their bare chests in the same shot as Montoya, but there's no outrage about that.
I did personally call it out on the first thread about it yesterday I think. Neither is acceptable. It just gets confusing bc the women had theirs cut off and the man had fake ones put in so it’s like bizarro world.
Although, to be fair, this reasoning works both ways. There were transmen who were exposing their bare chests in the same shot as Montoya, but there's no outrage about that.
When I see men walking around town topless, not at the pool, not working out, not at the beach I definitely think it’s weird, kind of trashy. Shirtless men )in this case, females with mastectomies ) as party guests at the White House. Super trashy.
The person who did that was banned by the White House, but it's unlikely that will get much attention. The issue wasn't with that specific protester but with the fact that event happened in the first place and even more so, that trans people are allowed to exist at all.
You’re actually right on this, except for the last line. Nobody can prevent a type of person from existing.
When I see men walking around town topless, not at the pool, not working out, not at the beach I definitely think it’s weird, kind of trashy. Shirtless men )in this case, females with mastectomies ) as party guests at the White House. Super trashy.
I personally don't have a problem with the concept of bare chested-ness even at the White House in this context, which was a festive event outside on the lawn. That said, and acknowledging that I'm in the minority on this, this went beyond mere bare chested individuals out relaxing, but involved sexualized fondling, which I condemn.
Based on the photo of Miss Thing and her mammaries I've reached this conclusion.
Just having breasts doesn't make you a lady.
I'm not offended by much but that photo offended me. At the White House. Such class (not)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
