Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2023, 07:10 AM
 
8,059 posts, read 3,949,135 times
Reputation: 5356

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
Oh for goodness’ sake. Such snowflakery.

Homosexual:Heterosexual
Disabled:Able bodied
Gay:Straight
Neurodivergent:Neurotypical
Transgender:Cisgender

It’s a word to describe the opposite majority, by the minority in question, to differentiate who they’re talking about, without using the word “normal”.

Anyone can use a word in a derogatory manner, depending on the context. The more Elon et al flap about offended by it, the more they’re going to yank their chains.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
You hit it on the head. The more it’s talked about, the greater the number of people who will understand it, and the quicker it will become normalized. It’s already in all of the dictionary sites.
Thank you for thoroughly discrediting the idea of "misgendering"... them cissies don't get to choose what we call them!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2023, 07:44 AM
 
13,429 posts, read 9,962,678 times
Reputation: 14358
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarlaJane View Post
Then just say “non-trans” or “people who aren’t trans.”

Your post highlighted very well that all of these ^^^ terms imply an “us vs. them” dynamic. And, again, people in the categories on the left tend to self-identify with those terms while people in the categories on the right do not self-identify with those terms, which is why such terms are problematic.
Or they just correctly identify that some people are gay, some aren’t, some people are autistic (or have ADHD, or OCD, or are suffering debilitating anxiety) - some aren’t, some people have disabilities, some don’t, or some people have gender incongruities, some don’t.

They’re just collective nouns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 07:46 AM
 
13,429 posts, read 9,962,678 times
Reputation: 14358
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
It’s an unnecessary qualifier word. Women are women, men are men. If a man wants to call himself a trans woman, fine. But we don’t need to change the language and act like we no longer understand the terms, man and woman.
It has nothing to do with men or women, as terms, cisgender is a collective noun for people that don’t have any incongruity about their gender.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 07:57 AM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,759,879 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
It has nothing to do with men or women, as terms, cisgender is a collective noun for people that don’t have any incongruity about their gender.
Women are adult human females and men are adult human males. Just because a tiny fraction of people are trans does not mean we need a qualifier word for these terms, women and man which do have actual meaning beyond being just a feeling, that we all understand.

You called people who don’t like being called cis, “snowflakes” so does that mean I can call a man who thinks he is a woman a man and if he objects I can call him a snowflake? Or someone who gets upset over being called she instead of “they” a snowflake?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,125,811 times
Reputation: 15135
I'm not offended by it. I feel sorry for the people who use it unironically. It's a defense mechanism employed so they don't have to deal with the fact that their sexual habits and perceptions of sex generally are abnormal.

Everyone who uses it is damaged in some way. Either they're part of the cult, or they're so weak minded that they've been manipulated into using words which were made up by cultists. Those are largely the same people who accept The Narrative without question and believe they're critical thinkers because they googled something once. I feel very sad for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,219,965 times
Reputation: 16752
WOKE ADJECTIVES

WHIMSICAL - unusual, amusing or playful manner
WHERSICAL - depressing, unappealing, miserable
WHITSICAL - humorous in a sarcastic way
WHATSICAL - can’t determine what gender, and gives up
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 08:11 AM
 
Location: In the north country fair
5,014 posts, read 10,702,253 times
Reputation: 7886
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
Or they just correctly identify that some people are gay, some aren’t, some people are autistic (or have ADHD, or OCD, or are suffering debilitating anxiety) - some aren’t, some people have disabilities, some don’t, or some people have gender incongruities, some don’t.

They’re just collective nouns.
No, they’re not—they’re labels. And they’re labels used by one group of people to refer to another without their permission. The trans community is trying to normalize the term “cis” without the permission of the group of people to whom the term is applied. That is what makes the term offensive.

Moreover, “neurotypical” is not the same as “someone who isn’t neurodivergent.” Using the term “neurotypical” (or any of the terms you cited as non-normative) is offensive when used by those who are neurodivergent to describe people who are not like them, especially when it is not a term with which a non-neurodivergent person uses to describe themselves.

For example, when a Black person refers to a White person, it isn’t usually offensive because the White person self-identifies as “white.” But many people do not refer to themselves as “cis,” which means that others should not refer to them that way either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,237 posts, read 18,599,254 times
Reputation: 25807
Words and symbols don't offend me. Government, Corporate and Societal pressure to comply with and applaud insanity does
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 08:12 AM
 
13,429 posts, read 9,962,678 times
Reputation: 14358
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
Women are adult human females and men are adult human males. Just because a tiny fraction of people are trans does not mean we need a qualifier word for these terms, women and man which do have actual meaning beyond being just a feeling, that we all understand.

You called people who don’t like being called cis, “snowflakes” so does that mean I can call a man who thinks he is a woman a man and if he objects I can call him a snowflake? Or someone who gets upset over being called she instead of “they” a snowflake?
It’s not a replacement term for women or men, it’s a term for people that don’t have gender incongruence.

You don’t need to use it. It wasn’t coined for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2023, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Troy, NY
20,685 posts, read 4,441,316 times
Reputation: 9888
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
Oh for goodness’ sake. Such snowflakery.

Homosexual:Heterosexual
Disabled:Able bodied
Gay:Straight
Neurodivergent:Neurotypical
Transgender:Cisgender

It’s a word to describe the opposite majority, by the minority in question, to differentiate who they’re talking about, without using the word “normal”.

Anyone can use a word in a derogatory manner, depending on the context. The more Elon et al flap about offended by it, the more they’re going to yank their chains.

So there you have it.
They (Transgender) don't want to call anyone who's not Transgender, what they really are normal. So they make up a BS word, to make themselves feel empowered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top