Who gained access to Joe Biden, when did they gain access to Joe Biden, and for what purpose?

[AguaDulce]

Originally Posted by paracord

I mean, even NBC is reporting it:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...2018-rcna29462

You're seriously unaware of this?

The House committee has tons of bank records from all of this.

You said: Well we KNOW that [Joe] Biden received payments from China, Ukraine, and the like, laundered by shell companies and [Hunter] his crackhead son's no-show jobs.

That article does not contain what you claim it does.

The Republicans on the Senate Finance and Homeland Security committees, then chaired by Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, respectively, issued their first report on Biden’s business dealings in September 2020. The 87-page report said Biden had “cashed in” on his name, but Johnson said in an interview before its release that the report included “no massive smoking guns.”

The last paragraph sums it all up:

“. . . Hunter Biden seems a lot like somebody whose primary profession is being Joe Biden’s son. But unless there’s a direct connection to Joe Biden, that’s really more of a criticism of one private citizen rather than a government official or an administration.”

[GotHereQuickAsICould]

Originally Posted by AguaDulce

I can't find anything on this and I'm tired of wading through all the same talking points over and over again.

This should help you understand what actually happened.

"There is no real dispute — and there has never been any real dispute — that Hunter Biden’s role was a function of his presenting himself as a conduit to his father. Instead, the debate is over the extent to which that presentation was accurate. "

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ght-testimony/

It goes through the various Republican talking points, none of which coincide with the timeline of what actually occurred.