Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
JFK despised MLK. And MLK was not "woke," as the term was being used at that time by black people. Malcolm X was woke.
"Woke" was appropriated by white radical liberals for an agenda that not even most black people accept, and the right had never heard the term until white radical liberals began using it for themselves.
Yes. Dr. King's famous speech containing the idea that people should not be judged by the color of their skin would not go over well today with many of today's extreme leftists, many of whom believe that all whites are evil and made some kind of contract with the devil. (Yes, really.) https://www.commonsensemedia.org/boo...-reviews/adult
If you want see the book page by page that proves what I wrote, go to YouTube.
Last edited by katharsis; 09-13-2023 at 02:07 PM..
Trump is basically the "new party", not really a Republican and you see how well that went.
So no, you have your choice, D or R, that is it.
Yes. It went very well with Trump. He pointed out traitors from both parties and continues to do that today.
Republicans wanted Jeb Bush in 2016. Another RINO. But the people had had enough.
And today we have total anarchy and destruction. RFK Jr is a sensible democrat but democrats want no part of that. He’s nowhere near woke enough for them.
Last edited by Leona Valley; 09-13-2023 at 01:54 PM..
Yes. It went very well with Trump. He pointed out traitors from both parties and continues to do that today.
Republicans wanted Jeb Bush in 2016. Another RINO. But the people had had enough.
And today we have total anarchy and destruction. RFK Jr is a sensible democrat but democrats want no part of that. He’s nowhere near woke enough for them.
Yeah, it all went very well with Trump until he decided to try and topple our democracy. No thanks.
Republicans had never heard of it...until white liberals appropriated the term as the term for their left-wing activism. That's how Republicans heard of it.
Sounds about right
It's like Rioters and Felons getting involved in the BLM movement, culminating in events like Kyle Rittenhouse shooting one White Child Rapist and 2 criminal Anarchist, with 2 dying. Had nothing to do with saving black people lives and was just about angry violent Felons going on a rampage.
Please also consider NoLabels.org They represent sanity. They are getting on the ballot in every state (with the DNC fighting them every step of the way) in case of a Trump/Biden rematch which most of the country doesn’t want. They seek to have a Unity ticket, with a moderate D and moderate R on the same ticket. Christie doesn’t have a snowballs chance of winning the primary.
Harlan Crow, buddy to Clarence Thomas, is a leading donor.
I looked into No Labels and very little information as to their platform was online when I checked. (I will check it again.) However, I do NOT like -- or at least I am suspicious -- of the political backgrounds of many of those politicians who are supporting it.
I would, however, love to see two MODERATES on the ballot, and I don't care what party they are from. (I still keep hoping that Tulsi Gabbard will run again.)
Yeah, it all went very well with Trump until he decided to try and topple our democracy. No thanks.
“It all went very well with Trump…..” Can’t believe you admit that. :-)
He didn’t try to topple anything. He has the right to suggest election fraud. You’ll see after the results of these witch hunts. Never suggested violence. Often stated “protest peacefully”. His words. Including on Jan 6.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.