Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
An amicus brief filed in that dead on arrival political stunt is not what I would call a hands on role - more of a bone to the boneheads.
Johnson voted against certifying the election and was involved, he is also just as conservative as Jordan which made him acceptable to the Gaetz wing of the party. However, he did not take as active of a role as Jordan, is not the bomb thrower and not nearly as controversial as Jordan, that ultimately made him a bit more acceptable to the Bacon wing of the party. The combination of the two basically made him a compromise candidate.
An amicus brief filed in that dead on arrival political stunt is not what I would call a hands on role - more of a bone to the boneheads.
He not only drafted a brief - he also worked closely with Trump to whip his fellow Republicans into signing in to it. He took an active role in the failed coup. I’m sure should the need arise, he will again step up to the plate to overturn the rule of the people to install Trump by extra Constitutional means.
Johnson voted against certifying the election and was involved, he is also just as conservative as Jordan which made him acceptable to the Gaetz wing of the party. However, he did not take as active of a role as Jordan, is not the bomb thrower and not nearly as controversial as Jordan, that ultimately made him a bit more acceptable to the Bacon wing of the party. The combination of the two basically made him a compromise candidate.
And one who may not survive the vote to fund the government/Ukraine. He has to choose and either way could get him another motion to vacate.
Johnson voted against certifying the election and was involved, he is also just as conservative as Jordan which made him acceptable to the Gaetz wing of the party. However, he did not take as active of a role as Jordan, is not the bomb thrower and not nearly as controversial as Jordan, that ultimately made him a bit more acceptable to the Bacon wing of the party. The combination of the two basically made him a compromise candidate.
I guess I am missing the goal or point of throwing out the previous speaker and voting in Johnson. Seems like an even swap and nothing will move along or change at all. We already had a House that was not going to get anything done, looks like that remains the case.
I guess I don't understand how this improved or changed anything in the house.
An overwhelming victory for the GOP and the country. Now let’s get back to impeaching Biden.
Yes! What a relief!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
