Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-28-2023, 11:46 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,740 posts, read 7,637,238 times
Reputation: 15012

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annandale_Man View Post
If a business tried to pay someone 30 cents an hour, no one would apply and they would be forced to close. The business sets the pay based on its ability to attract workers willing to accept a set wage based on their own economic situation. Businesses compete for qualified workers.
That is hilarious, and only exists in a theoretical world.
TRANSLATION: I can't refute any of it, or even come up with coherent arguments. But I hate it anyway, so I'll call it names and hope somebody believes me somewhere.

 
Old 12-28-2023, 11:51 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,262 posts, read 18,396,803 times
Reputation: 35088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I don't mind paying 5% more. A Big Mac is $3.99, a meal is $5.99, I assume they are the regular size. Even 40 cents more won't break the bank.

The smaller companies would have less operating cost, employees could gravitate to larger chains depending on location.

Maybe the higher price will help fight obesity.
Where you are is cheap.

My local McD's....Big Mac is $5.99 and a Big Mac meal is $11.73
 
Old 12-28-2023, 12:20 PM
 
6,395 posts, read 2,726,604 times
Reputation: 6141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I don't mind paying 5% more. A Big Mac is $3.99, a meal is $5.99, I assume they are the regular size. Even 40 cents more won't break the bank.

The smaller companies would have less operating cost, employees could gravitate to larger chains depending on location.

Maybe the higher price will help fight obesity.
For reference, a Big Mac at my local McDonald's per their App is $5.59, want the meal? It's only $10.89. And this is before the increase in the Minimum Wage. So I guess you've already been priced out.

And if anything smaller companies often have more operating costs. They don't have the buying power of the bigger companies because they don't buy as much and can't often get the same wholesale discounts.

And you just confirmed exactly my point. If there are larger chains the employees could go to, it will cost the small mom-and-pop restaurants to pay more to keep them. So all of the liberals saying that it won't affect "small business" are being very misleading in their claims.
 
Old 12-28-2023, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,845 posts, read 19,525,151 times
Reputation: 9629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I don't mind paying 5% more. A Big Mac is $3.99, a meal is $5.99, I assume they are the regular size. Even 40 cents more won't break the bank.

The smaller companies would have less operating cost, employees could gravitate to larger chains depending on location.

Maybe the higher price will help fight obesity.
GN, a big mac hasnt been 3.99 (sandwich only) for like 20 years
 
Old 12-28-2023, 12:45 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,262 posts, read 18,396,803 times
Reputation: 35088
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
GN, a big mac hasnt been 3.99 (sandwich only) for like 20 years
And that's why they are "willing to pay more" because they haven't bought a Big Mac in 20 years
 
Old 12-28-2023, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
25,900 posts, read 12,926,296 times
Reputation: 19435
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
The FBI was investigating "parents" who spoke out at school board meetings and threatened school board members with potential violence.

The Department of Education does very little with respect to policy. It's main role is to distribute grants to schools with large populations of lower socioeconomic status children.

Teachers unions vary in power. In Texas, the teacher unions lobby the legislature(with little effect, since the GOP in this state hates public education) and provide support to teachers who file a grievance with the school districts. Texas teachers are not allowed to collectively bargain and it is illegal for them to strike.
Untrue...the FBI as intimidating parents who spoke out againat the school boards, but did NOT threaten anyone:

https://www.ncregister.com/cna/paren...-witnesses-say

Since the Dept of Ed was formed, education in the USA has fallen down the global list of countries with the best public education, and now we are spending more per pupil than ever. The Dept of Ed needs to be abolished. The local school districts do not need anything from them. The fed dept of ed is an unneeded financial drain upon the system.

Teachers unions are a conflict of interest, becaause they lobby against parental rights, & protect bad teachers from getting fired.
 
Old 12-28-2023, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,243,858 times
Reputation: 16762
Personnel budgets don't magically fill up despite the belief in the invisible pink unicorn of socialism farting rainbows of money.
 
Old 12-28-2023, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Sunny So. Cal.
4,432 posts, read 1,719,565 times
Reputation: 3320
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
Untrue...the FBI as intimidating parents who spoke out againat the school boards, but did NOT threaten anyone:

https://www.ncregister.com/cna/paren...-witnesses-say

Since the Dept of Ed was formed, education in the USA has fallen down the global list of countries with the best public education, and now we are spending more per pupil than ever. The Dept of Ed needs to be abolished. The local school districts do not need anything from them. The fed dept of ed is an unneeded financial drain upon the system.

Teachers unions are a conflict of interest, becaause they lobby against parental rights, & protect bad teachers from getting fired.
Teachers unions are not a conflict of interest. They are there to represent workers, just like all unions.
 
Old 12-28-2023, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,845 posts, read 19,525,151 times
Reputation: 9629
Quote:
Originally Posted by stone26 View Post
Teachers unions are not a conflict of interest. They are there to represent workers, just like all unions.
unions are supposed to represent the workers MISSION, not the individual, who could be great, good, not so good, poor or just down right bad.

and for teachers the mission is educating the children, nothing else.
 
Old 12-28-2023, 02:59 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,262 posts, read 18,396,803 times
Reputation: 35088
Quote:
Originally Posted by stone26 View Post
Teachers unions are not a conflict of interest. They are there to represent workers, just like all unions.

Government workers needing a union to protect them against....the government being a bad employer ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top