Did Biden Administration Plant Classified Docs at MAL to get Trump?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If we can believe Schumer, 'the intel agencies have 6 ways to Sunday to get back at you'.
what does schumer know about intel taking revenge on those opposed?
A pattern of inappropriate behavior is revealed by schumer.
FBI files false warrants to prosecute Trump and his supporters
FBI partners with the media
51 intel agents lie about HB's laptop computer
Media suppresses stories about HB's computer
Schiff continues to spread lies
NYAG campaigns on prosecuting Trump
Laws are contorted and twisted to prosecute Trump
Clyburn refuses to talk to Trump
Pelosi rips up the SOTU speech
Media constantly disrespectful to Trump
Makes the claim reasonable that the docs were planted on Trump.
"Schiff continues to spread lies"
Still waiting for him to produce all the papers he claims he has seen.
Explain why biden's docs were NOT treated the same way Trumps' were by the FBI.
Biden had classified docs ever since he was a Senator and NONE were in any kind of a secure place, which is AGAINST THE LAW!
Why NO early morning "raid" with no FOX there to cover it ?
Funny how none of our left friends ever want to talk about THAT!
What has happened to biden for this?
Because when they were discovered he gave them back. There wouldn't have been a raid on Trump's home and he wouldn't be facing charges if he'd done the same.
Funny how the right doesn't want to talk about that.
Because when they were discovered he gave them back. There wouldn't have been a raid on Trump's home and he wouldn't be facing charges if he'd done the same.
Funny how the right doesn't want to talk about that.
Funny how you are making things up.
"There wouldn't have been a raid on Trump's home and he wouldn't be facing charges if he'd done the same."
Provide when he was asked for the docs.
.
Explain how cnn knew of the raid on Trump so they could be there at 6 A.M. in the morning.
Then provide the videos of them at biden's place.
Oh, wait, there AREN'T ANY!
Explain how a senator has classified docs at is home in the 1 st place and are NOT locked up in a secure place..
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,829 posts, read 12,682,742 times
Reputation: 10565
Quote:
Originally Posted by heySkippy
Because when they were discovered he gave them back. There wouldn't have been a raid on Trump's home and he wouldn't be facing charges if he'd done the same.
Funny how the right doesn't want to talk about that.
Because none of what you say is true. The Hur report, the newly redacted documents, paying attention and common sense says your comments are false.
How is it that such an important story, no mainline news reporting agency(newsmax, Fox, etc) has said one word about this.
It would seem this is news worthy.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,829 posts, read 12,682,742 times
Reputation: 10565
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY
How is it that such an important story, no mainline news reporting agency(newsmax, Fox, etc) has said one word about this.
It would seem this is news worthy.
They're reporting it, and many have been doing so for days/a week+. Newsmax has reported on it but doesn't have too many stories it seems.
Leftwing media seems to be covering it but most of what I'd seen is they'll cherry pick a tiny portion and then they try to make it appear to be the fault of "orange man bad". I think it was MSNBC had talked about Nauta and claiming that he'd lied, yet they'd refused to mention that Jack Smith had him threatened unless he cooperated with Smith and say what Smith wanted him to say.
You shouldn't get snarky if you want others to do something for you.
I posted a couple of links to a couple of videos that had showed a few pages, you are the one who'd refused to watch what I had posted. I had also told you that I know of no central data base that has all of the pages in it, apparently there are somewhere around 400 pages. So, I have no clue what you are claiming I had 'took my time to reference'. Other than the videos I'd posted and to suggest that you read the link in the OP and Julie's twitter feed and saying that there are a ton of pages out there that I don't know how to find all of them, I don't know what you felt I needed to reference for you. You do realize I am not the one who'd created this thread, don't you?
Anyway, since you want others to do your research for you to help you connect the dots, then I will do it for you... but just this one time.
From the link in the OP:
Investigative journalist Julie Kelly found something interesting in the documents that could change everything. The first things is testimony from an FBI agent who testified that the General Services Administration (GSA) had been in possession of Trump's boxes in Virginia before ordering Trump's team to come get them.
Then she shows a screen shot of some of the testimony. and then she continues on:
"So an entire pallet full of boxes that had been held by GSA somewhere outside of DC is dumped at Mar-a-Lago," Kelly notes. "Apparently these are the boxes that ended up containing papers with 'classified markings.'"
connecting the dots:
Boxes were taken by GSA from the WH to their storage in VA.
After some time, GSA told Trump they needed to get them out of GSA's storage.
The boxes were transported to MAL.
Then the FBI pops up to say that they suspect there are classified docs in some of those boxes the GSA had had and had sent to MAL. convenient, eh? To get a search warrant an FBI agent testified that classified docs were possibly in those boxes at MAL, again, convenient. We already knew about that FBI agent's testimony back when the raid had happened and the redacted search warrant had been released, remember?
To refresh your memory, I guess, and to learn more of what was in the search warrant... here is a video where you can see and read the recently unredacted version of that search warrant (watch it, don't watch it, Idc):
The boxes were packed by Trump’s transition team. Here are the emails between Trump’s transition team and the GSA regarding packing, palleting and shipping of the boxes. The GSA provided funds, office space and shipping costs for Trump’s team to complete the transition. These emails provide details including the boxes the transition team picked.
Nothing you’ve provided appears to show evidence that the GSA planted classified documents in the boxes. The boxes were extensively shrink wrapped to the pallets by the transition team. There are photos detailing such and an email where a member of Trump’s team expresses that they can’t find the shrink wrap.
These emails appear to show the provenance of the boxes - who packed them, shipped them and where they ended up. If you have conflicting evidence regarding the provenance of the boxes in the release of the redacted documents can you show it please.
Last edited by FinsterRufus; 04-30-2024 at 03:55 PM..
Reason: Palleting not pelleting
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
