Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Revenge porn isn't in the public domain like criticism of a public figure is. It is a crime to release sexual images of a person without their consent, no matter how famous they are.
For example, Hulk Hogan won 115 million dollars from Gawkers because they released his sextape without his permission.
Tommy Lee and Pamela Anderson won over a million dollars in their lawsuit with IEG for releasing their sextape.
Well, an image with the bits blurred over or black boxed out is a far cry from the sex tapes of the others.
That said, FOX has taken down their miniseries.
Since I'm not up on the wording of the revenge porn laws, I'll leave that to the lawyers and take a wait and see attitude. No doubt they can find a "friendly venue" for a lawsuit if they ever decide to file one.
The problem with your argument is that it wouldn't matter if he did, because ownership of the laptop is irrelevant as he was answering questions about the nature of the Ukraine scandal.
If you told me someone has possession of my diary, and added the context of " they said on page 300, that you shot an unruly hunting dog(LOL)" something I had never done. Me saying "the diary is fake because I never did that " would be me answering that the page of the diary is fake. not that I don't have a diary somewhere. I assumed the whole thing was fake because I never did the thing listed in the diary.
Biden didn't even say the laptop was fake, but he very clearly could have assumed it seeing as he didn't do the things claimed in the report, which again, the guy who lied about it is now in jail for doing so, and that's why you don't have congressional hearing about Hunter Biden anymore.
Yall are weirdly nitpicking a technicality,and you are even wrong about that.
no sir, you need a lot more studying. Im gonna go with the experts on this one. and you have trouble dealing with evidence in law, and in congress. EVERYTHING you submit, WRITTEN or SPOKEN, sworn is treated the same. He, did this. There is nothing you can post on an interweb that will ever change that. *that* is the hurdle you need to get your brain over.
oh and btw, not only did he say it was fake (in one iteration) he expanded on this in ANOTHER sworn statement that it could be russian disinformation <--direct quote. NO ONE, is going to argue that he did not distance himself from the veracity of the evidence and this would be an affirmative defense. <-- another legal term you need to look up, and I aint even a lawyer, nor play one on TV, naked or clothed.
AND, the 'revenge porn' supposedly aired (it wasnt) was redacted (meaning the naught bits removed) which make it not porn at all - right? AND, they came from hunters own pornhub account, which has been proven he owned, signed up and paid for.
Like I said now thrice, he has a lot to squirrel out from under, not withstanding he made it clear in over a dozen published statements, the images are not he, but rather a fox paid for lookalike. (so if anyone has a case (no one does), it would be this fox paid for actor.
IF you are trying to join his legal team, words of advice: dont take a case that is lost from the outset, as your first. NEver make partner that way...
no sir, you need a lot more studying. Im gonna go with the experts on this one. and you have trouble dealing with evidence in law, and in congress. EVERYTHING you submit, WRITTEN or SPOKEN, sworn is treated the same. He, did this. There is nothing you can post on an interweb that will ever change that. *that* is the hurdle you need to get your brain over.
oh and btw, not only did he say it was fake (in one iteration) he expanded on this in ANOTHER sworn statement that it could be russian disinformation <--direct quote. NO ONE, is going to argue that he did not distance himself from the veracity of the evidence and this would be an affirmative defense. <-- another legal term you need to look up, and I aint even a lawyer, nor play one on TV, naked or clothed.
AND, the 'revenge porn' supposedly aired (it wasnt) was redacted (meaning the naught bits removed) which make it not porn at all - right? AND, they came from hunters own pornhub account, which has been proven he owned, signed up and paid for.
Like I said now thrice, he has a lot to squirrel out from under, not withstanding he made it clear in over a dozen published statements, the images are not he, but rather a fox paid for lookalike. (so if anyone has a case (no one does), it would be this fox paid for actor.
IF you are trying to join his legal team, words of advice: dont take a case that is lost from the outset, as your first. NEver make partner that way...
Not up on the exact laws but if FOX took it down, Biden likely has some semblance of a case. (Or in my previous post they recognize they might wind up in a very blue venue)
That being said, you make an excellent point that to make a case...they'll have to admit to previous perjury and admit that it's real etc.
So it kinda seems like this one may just end up as a standoff where taking down the miniseries is the goal and nothing further will happen.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,856 posts, read 12,705,334 times
Reputation: 10582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy
Not up on the exact laws but if FOX took it down, Biden likely has some semblance of a case. (Or in my previous post they recognize they might wind up in a very blue venue)
That being said, you make an excellent point that to make a case...they'll have to admit to previous perjury and admit that it's real etc.
So it kinda seems like this one may just end up as a standoff where taking down the miniseries is the goal and nothing further will happen.
By taking it down, Fox isn't claiming any wrongdoing on their part.
The six-part program, “The Trial of Hunter Biden,” had been available on Fox Nation, the network’s digital streaming platform, but will stay down at least temporarily pending a review, per the network.
“This program was produced in and has been available since 2022. We are reviewing the concerns that have just been raised and — out of an abundance of caution in the interim — have taken it down,” a Fox News spokesperson told The Post.
Hunter Biden, a drug addict who paid underage girls to fly across the country for sex, boinked his sister in law right after his brother died, and now he’s taking the high road and claiming his reputation has been damaged?
Not up on the exact laws but if FOX took it down, Biden likely has some semblance of a case. (Or in my previous post they recognize they might wind up in a very blue venue)
That being said, you make an excellent point that to make a case...they'll have to admit to previous perjury and admit that it's real etc.
So it kinda seems like this one may just end up as a standoff where taking down the miniseries is the goal and nothing further will happen.
Biden and his attorneys would not threaten the lawsuit if they didn't have a good chance of winning. Fox News paid out millions in settlements in the last 4 years. Gateway Pundit filed CH11 after losing against GA election workers. It's not looking good for Pundit as the BK will not discharge a judgment from a lawsuit where they were found to have committed malicious injury. My prediction is Fox News does not return the series to their channel loosing millions from revenue.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,856 posts, read 12,705,334 times
Reputation: 10582
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251
No, you are just clearly playing a game arguing in circles, and its obvious, so I'm declaring it over and you lost.
uh huh, sure
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
