Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2009, 12:20 AM
 
18,137 posts, read 25,321,890 times
Reputation: 16851

Advertisements

Are you guys against or in favor of it?

Obama says end subsidy to large U.S. farms | Economy | Reuters

President Barack Obama called on Tuesday for an end to "direct payments to large agribusinesses that don't need them," an apparent attack on subsidies costing $5.2 billion a year (Our tax dollars)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2009, 04:55 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,570,733 times
Reputation: 27720
I'm all for big agribusiness NOT getting subsidies. They don't need subsidies.
Most of the subsidy money goes to big agribusiness, food processors and multi-nationals to subsidize the commodity market prices. Very little goes to small to medium farms.

I hope smaller farmers get the subsidies - they are the ones living season to season with not much to tide them over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:21 AM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,875,448 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
Are you guys against or in favor of it?

Obama says end subsidy to large U.S. farms | Economy | Reuters

President Barack Obama called on Tuesday for an end to "direct payments to large agribusinesses that don't need them," an apparent attack on subsidies costing $5.2 billion a year (Our tax dollars)

Of course.....Obama needs that money to send to his South Chicago welfare moms who don't work and just have babies to milk the system. Hard providing for 10 chilins!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:24 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,497,367 times
Reputation: 4014
If you opposed the so-called bank or auto bailouts, you haven't really left yourself much room to be supporting continued subsidies to big agribusiness...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:25 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,192,257 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
Of course.....Obama needs that money to send to his South Chicago welfare moms who don't work and just have babies to milk the system. Hard providing for 10 chilins!!
Your posts are consistently entertaining, always in this same flavor. Keep up the good work!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:33 AM
 
7,993 posts, read 12,875,448 times
Reputation: 2731
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Your posts are consistently entertaining, always in this same flavor. Keep up the good work!
How sweet. Thank you.
I very much like the many "delusional" post as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:35 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,192,257 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsupstate View Post
How sweet. Thank you.
I very much like the many "delusional" post as well.
Im so glad, I write them just for you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
5,615 posts, read 14,804,582 times
Reputation: 2555
If this means ending sugar subsidies (or tariffs?) I'm all for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:57 AM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,094,501 times
Reputation: 3937
I have ALWAYS been 100% against farm susidies....I'm VERY well aware of how this works and have seen NOTHING but abuse of this system for years...end it ALL now is my vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2009, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Way South of the Volvo Line
2,788 posts, read 8,020,645 times
Reputation: 2846
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I'm all for big agribusiness NOT getting subsidies. They don't need subsidies.
Most of the subsidy money goes to big agribusiness, food processors and multi-nationals to subsidize the commodity market prices. Very little goes to small to medium farms.

I hope smaller farmers get the subsidies - they are the ones living season to season with not much to tide them over.
I agree. Here in Maine there is mostly small farms, many dying out due to lots of reasons, not the least being big subsidies that fund big agribusiness practices like the massive use of chemicals and even bigger equipment. I've heard many stories of "homesteading" celebrities and lobbyists with large tracts of lands using farm subsidies to cut their tax burden.

Give the money to the farmer that is feeding American families locally instead of manufacturing processed foodstuffs for an overseas impulse market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top