Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-13-2008, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
12,526 posts, read 17,435,340 times
Reputation: 10629

Advertisements

I'm not a smoker, except for that wacky weed back in college, but I'm opposed to this new law. Why is that the casinos can smoke all they want, but the Mom and Pop Bars that are struggling with the 10% tax and the recession, now have to turn their smoking customers away? Gee, I dunno, money perhaps. How much coin is going into the pockets of our illustrious elected officials to allow smoking in casinos?

What a joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-13-2008, 02:36 PM
 
31 posts, read 78,796 times
Reputation: 38
Default Doowopmarine

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
Just a quick note, but you even aside from the long term cancer risk, secondhand smoke also causes an immediate allergic reaction in some people, strongly affects some people's sense of smell and taste, and so forth. All that is sufficient legal grounds for treating smoking in enclosed public places as a "public nuisance" subject to a ban.

The basic fact smokers need to grasp is that their smoke is physically entering other people's bodies against their will, and they don't like how it affects them. And you don't have the right to impose such an outcome on other people in public places.
I agree with you, hence the real fair solution is to have smokers only bars
and restaurants. Unless you think smokers don't have a right to that!
Remember INCLUSION-INCLUSION-INCLUSION! United States Land of the
FREE and the Brave, Well I was brave, but I don't feel very free!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 02:41 PM
 
1,139 posts, read 2,484,922 times
Reputation: 421
I do have to say that as much as I agree with smoking bans...the PA one is a little unfair in that Philadelphia gets to have a stronger one...and there are some loopholes allowing some places to have smoking and others not. That is what will be bad for businesses is that some are allowed to have smoking, and others are not. Should be all or none. And maybe the whole United States should have a ban...although I don't think I wanna witness the uproar that would bring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,316 posts, read 120,167,257 times
Reputation: 35920
I do not believe in prohibiiton, and it didn't work the last time it was tried, anyway. But I do have concerns for the employees at these hypothetical "smoking" bars and restaurants that people are always suggesting on these threads. Even if people are agreeing to work there, being aware of the hazards, it is not right to expose them to second-hand smoke. If you have people sign a waiver, you are admitting there is a problem, and waivers usually aren't worth the paper they're printed on, anyway. You could get sued for exposing them to a carcinogen and causing their cancer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 03:28 PM
 
31 posts, read 78,796 times
Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifepgh2op View Post
I do have to say that as much as I agree with smoking bans...the PA one is a little unfair in that Philadelphia gets to have a stronger one...and there are some loopholes allowing some places to have smoking and others not. That is what will be bad for businesses is that some are allowed to have smoking, and others are not. Should be all or none. And maybe the whole United States should have a ban...although I don't think I wanna witness the uproar that would bring.

Why does it have to all or none? It proves how idiotic and narrow minded
our Pa. legislators are. Logic and common sense tells you let the market
decide and everybody wins. Or is that too reasonable and simple? I'm
afraid big brother has to decide that for all of us, disregarding the market
and citizens right to choose. Maybe you are afraid the smokers bars will
do better than the non smokers bars! In Allegheny county that's a given.
That's why the establishment does'nt want free choice, it defeats their
agenda of control. Well they are still gonna lose because the drinkers
that spend "real money" wont go! Bars know where the serious income is
and it isn't from non smokers. We shall see in a year how many bars close.

In England they banned smoking and 70% of the pubs have closed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
29,627 posts, read 34,087,515 times
Reputation: 76611
Quote:
In England they banned smoking and 70% of the pubs have closed.
That's not exactly true. While a larger number of pubs have closed in 2007 as compared to 2006 and 2005, it's nowhere near 70% of the total number of pubs in Britain. The economy is bad there as well as here, so it can't be entirely blamed on the smoking ban.

You're also not considering that a great number of non-smokers will start populating bars now that they don't have to stay home to avoid the smoke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Beaver County
1,273 posts, read 1,629,742 times
Reputation: 1211
I love it and support it fully! I hated when I moved here and had to battle all the cigarette smoke if we wanted to go out and eat. I don't need to read any studies to know that it stinks, smoker's breath stinks, it makes my clothes stinks, and it make me cough. Smokers had their "rights" the first 200something years---now its my time now!
Smoking sections were a joke--like a peeing section in a pool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 03:48 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,058 posts, read 46,570,390 times
Reputation: 33896
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOWOPMARINE View Post
Thank you for all the FACTUAL INFORMATION , but I'm certain the do gooders don't want factual truths. Their extreme lefist agendas are going
to ruin this country!

Things I can't do any more:
1 Drink over two beers without facing DUI charges.
2 Bet football games online.
3 Drink my "two beers" in a bar and converse with my friends. ( I could
say hold that thought While I go out in the cold and smoke) "I DON'T THINK SO"!
4 Go to a restaurant and enjoy a cigarette with my coffee after the meal

The things I enjoy list is getting shorter and shorter. The last straw will be
when the government trys to take all the law abiding citizens guns.!
It's called the majority. You can't drink and drive but the other 200 million can drive safely knowing noone is drunk on the road.
The MAJORITY of us can now eat in a restaurant without sitting next to someone chain smoking making us nauseas. The majority win over the minority and that is how it should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,316 posts, read 120,167,257 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
It's called the majority. You can't drink and drive but the other 200 million can drive safely knowing noone is drunk on the road.
The MAJORITY of us can now eat in a restaurant without sitting next to someone chain smoking making us nauseas. The majority win over the minority and that is how it should be.
I agree to a point. In this situation, I would say it's a public health issue, not a majority/minority issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2008, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Hell with the lid off, baby!
2,193 posts, read 5,781,397 times
Reputation: 380
Puff, puff, pass
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top