Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:02 PM
 
7,381 posts, read 7,693,440 times
Reputation: 1266

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mb919 View Post
Soviet communism was a system that was bound to buckle under the weight of its own flawed ideology.
Yet liberals advocate the same policies that were present in the old Soviet Union.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:03 PM
 
3,049 posts, read 8,908,098 times
Reputation: 1174
we have given a great economy, a wonderful foundation of liberty, firm strong values and families
support for a strong national defense, limited government, the rights of the individual,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:07 PM
 
Location: N.H.
1,022 posts, read 3,475,856 times
Reputation: 471
O.K. For some reason all these people seem to think that the conservatives at the time where liberals. You say something and the reply is well he was a liberal. It is called Republican. And our issues have and always will trump the liberals. Seeming how you all just cry ya but he was a liberal I will start with the most recent and work my way back. TAX RELIEF ACT-P.L. 108-27, Free Trade acts P.L. 108-77 and 108-78, Transportation ACT P.L. 108-88, MY Favorite AMERICAN DREAM DOWN PAYMENT ACT(S.811) P.L.108-186, The plastic gun ban P.L.108-174-(this would have expired if not for the Republicans of all parties) Oh and lets not forget the NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT. Ya it has some fine tunning left but it went farther than the liberals went. Than we have the Reagan era, Cold War anyone. What about the Berlin Wall? Nuclear arms reduction treaty? So are you saying 1 of the great Presidents was a liberal? OH and the WOMAN will love this The year was 1919 And after the Dem's had defeated a measure 4 times they also lost control of the senate, To the republicans. And low and behold that year after 4 years of trying the REPUBLICANS PASSED the womans right to vote. After the Dem's said NO 4 TIMES. Oh and 1917 the first woman to serve in the senate was Jeannette Rankin of Montana, A yup REPUBLICAN. Than you have REPUBLICAN President Benjamin Harrison who in 1890 passed the ANTI TRUST ACT.(you know that one that stops stores like Walmart And the monopolies. Than you have 1866 Republicans OVERRODE A Presidential VETO, There by giving Blacks Citizenship. In 1868 they also gave them Equal right and in 1871 Gave them Voting right. All of this stuff the Liberals fought tooth and nail. And to say well they where liberals in a different time is a cop-out. It is called Party lines. Just for good measure here is 1 more the year was 1957 IKE was President And HE pushed and Passed the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. And he went up against the ONE AND ONLY SEN. KENNEDY and other LIBERAL DEM'S who tried to block it, And Even went as far as Staging a 24 HR FILIBUSTER. This is why I will always VOTE Republican. Dem's care about what gets them elected Republicans Have a history of doing what is right. Ya every now and then 1 doesn't but that is better than the DEM's that Never have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Central CT, sometimes FL and NH.
4,538 posts, read 6,801,889 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozarks21 View Post
I thought you were trying to use a unified definition. The modern conservative - the Reagan-Gingrich conservatives are typified by the Federalist Society, small government, States Rights and strict construction. All of this is a throwback to James Madison and the boys. We are the greatest nation in the world because we have been able to restrain the central government to prevent many of the abuses seen elsewhere and to maintain a free market (classic liberal) economy despite the efforts of the modern socialist liberals who would rather see us tinkering with failed economic systems and greater government control.
Nicely put Ozarks! One of my favorite Madison quotes:

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."
James Madison
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:14 PM
 
Location: in my imagination
13,608 posts, read 21,394,406 times
Reputation: 10111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaznjohn View Post
Yet liberals advocate the same policies that were present in the old Soviet Union.
I understand what you mean,but I'll actually disagree on that to a point.I don't think American progressive liberals want a communist system to that extent I think they are more in tune to certain european socialism,which with that system once there are more people collecting then putting in it will fail.

It seems progressive liberals will champion "certain" liberty but promote a centralized system specially on social and economic issues.But the thought that "the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few" does not jive with the ideals of personal liberty and responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:14 PM
 
7,381 posts, read 7,693,440 times
Reputation: 1266
Sorry to disappoint, but the 19th Century Republicans were liberals and I'm a fiscal conservative myself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Tucson, AZ
1,697 posts, read 3,481,805 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by carolinajack View Post
we have given a great economy, a wonderful foundation of liberty, firm strong values and families
support for a strong national defense, limited government, the rights of the individual,
The economy where savings rates amongst Americans are the lowest they've been since the Great Depression? The record surplus that Bush managed to turn into the record deficit? The economy that's sustainable until China decides it feels like taking its marbles and going home?

Values like Rob Ney and Duke Cunningham values? Or are you thinking more along the lines of Mark Foley values? Or maybe Jack Abramoff values?

Are you thinking of the military that is being stretched to its breaking point when you speak of a strong military? The military that's been fighting in Iraq not only with no clear mission or strategy but also without adequate armor?

Are you talking about the Military Commissions Act that takes away the 800-year old right to habeas corpus when you speak of our individual rights? Or the right's never-ending quest to tell women what they can and can't do with their bodies? Or are you thinking of the right to have your mail opened because your president thinks it's his right to do that? Maybe it's limited government you're thinking of.

Please tell me again how today's conservatism applies to ANY of the points you made.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:19 PM
 
7,381 posts, read 7,693,440 times
Reputation: 1266
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionking View Post
I understand what you mean,but I'll actually disagree on that to a point.I don't think American progressive liberals want a communist system to that extent I think they are more in tune to certain european socialism,which with that system once there are more people collecting then putting in it will fail.

It seems progressive liberals will champion "certain" liberty but promote a centralized system specially on social and economic issues.But the thought that "the needs of the many out weigh the needs of the few" does not jive with the ideals of personal liberty and responsibility.
What "certain" liberties are you speaking of? Centralized control of economic aspects are considered statist policies. Statist policies discourage individual achievement by punishing achievement, making those who achieve responsible for the well-being of those who choose not to achieve, thus rewarding poor behavior and removing responsibility for bad choices. Individual achievement produces jobs and expands the economy, making life better for all classes of individuals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:21 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 10,823,821 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb919 View Post
Values like Rob Ney and Duke Cunningham values? Or are you thinking more along the lines of Mark Foley values? Or maybe Jack Abramoff values?

Are you thinking of the military that is being stretched to its breaking point when you speak of a strong military? The military that's been fighting in Iraq not only with no clear mission or strategy but also without adequate armor?

Are you talking about the Military Commissions Act that takes away the 800-year old right to habeas corpus when you speak of our individual rights? Or the right's never-ending quest to tell women what they can and can't do with their bodies? Or are you thinking of the right to have your mail opened because your president thinks it's his right to do that? Maybe it's limited government you're thinking of.

Please tell me again how today's conservatism applies to ANY of the points you made.
perhaps you would rather live with the taliban i understand there real strong on the womens rights issues!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2007, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Tucson, AZ
1,697 posts, read 3,481,805 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayeagley View Post
perhaps you would rather live with the taliban i understand there real strong on the womens rights issues!
Another thing the conservatives have blessed us with: straw man arguments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top