Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If by this you mean to say that now we can all share in the wealth, all get medical help when needed, all are now looking to much briter future. And most of all, seeing peace on the horizon and our kids coming home safe and sound. Then YES ! Thank you for the complement, especially when comparing it to the last 8 years with the morons we were all stuck with.
Share the wealth, huh?
Why should the "rich guy" bust his tail to give you a "tax cut" check? You think the "rich guy" is that dumb? He'll either figure out a way to earn less (and collect his own "tax cut" check) or he'll take his business to another country.
When you invade/occupy a country that had NOTHING to do with the attack on your country.
Well, you're wrong on this point. If that were true, why did we invade contries in WWII that had not attacked us?
It's called "strategy". Iraq was a strategic objective in the war on terror.
I'm glad you aren't responsible for developing a war plan, we would have never won WWII, and there would certainly be no hope in winning a war on terror.
Well, you're wrong on this point. If that were true, why did we invade contries in WWII that had not attacked us?
It's called "strategy". Iraq was a strategic objective in the war on terror.
I'm glad you aren't responsible for developing a war plan, we would have never won WWII, and there would certainly be no hope in winning a war on terror.
Umm, imma guess...cos we had ALLIES?
You people have ruined all our allies.
We're gonna get them back, by acting like rational human beings.
Why should the "rich guy" bust his tail to give you a "tax cut" check? You think the "rich guy" is that dumb? He'll either figure out a way to earn less (and collect his own "tax cut" check) or he'll take his business to another country.
A lot of business will be leaving the country, as the U.S. already has the highest Capital Gains rate in the world, and Obama has promised to raise it.
Also, look for downsizing and huge job layoffs, as companies work to reduce their costs.
This is not going to be the victory that these idiots that voted for this guy think it's going to be. He is going to do exactly what he said he was going to do. And we are going to be more bankrupt than we are already.
Now you know it feels like when all you idiots crying now voted Bush in twice. Go floss yourselves.
I didn't vote for Bush or Barak. I usually pick whoever has better policies. And I sure would've liked to see the child tax credit rise from $3,500 to $7,000. But too late for that! Oh well!
Well, you're wrong on this point. If that were true, why did we invade contries in WWII that had not attacked us?
It's called "strategy". Iraq was a strategic objective in the war on terror.
I'm glad you aren't responsible for developing a war plan, we would have never won WWII, and there would certainly be no hope in winning a war on terror.
I'm glad that you and the people you support will not be making the decisions after Jan 20.
You send your own countrymen, happily, to die for a war that was never needed nor justified.
All it did was cause us to take our eye off the ball in Afghanistan and tick the world off at us.
And we see how that worked out.
I wonder, if, since McCain told us he knows "how to get Bin Laden" if he will share that "info" with the new administration.
Oh wait. I forgot that this claim has to be true first. Liar John, you're a liar. You told Americans you could get Bin laden, for votes. If you know how to get him John, why aren't you telling us? Liar.
I didn't vote for Bush or Barak. I usually pick whoever has better policies. And I sure would've liked to see the child tax credit rise from $3,500 to $7,000. But too late for that! Oh well!
Yes, now that would have been helpful to our country. No child tax credit now .
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,281 posts, read 54,065,692 times
Reputation: 40571
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy
Well, you're wrong on this point. If that were true, why did we invade contries in WWII that had not attacked us?
Because unlike the 9/11 attacks whcih were NOT made by a nation/state, the countries we invaded in WW II either attacked us or were allied with one that did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy
It's called "strategy". Iraq was a strategic objective in the war on terror.
I call it misleadership and utter FAILURE to go after the real enemy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy
I'm glad you aren't responsible for developing a war plan, we would have never won WWII, and there would certainly be no hope in winning a war on terror.
And YOU would've done what? Watched the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor and suggest we invade Mexico in retaliation?
Last edited by burdell; 11-05-2008 at 07:47 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.