Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Wilmington, NC
8,577 posts, read 7,795,489 times
Reputation: 835

Advertisements

being a liar and saying what you can to get elected isn't specific to palin. that's what a politician does.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kid Quake View Post
Sarah Palin drove more people to the polls than Obama did. She drove them all to the Dem side because se proved herself to be a liar and a person that would say anything to get herself elected.

But all she accomplished was geting herself un-elected in 2010 in Alaska.

... and offered a porn movie deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:21 PM
 
251 posts, read 411,423 times
Reputation: 88
She was running on change and country first. If you wanna be a sheep that don't come out saying that you're going to be different. She got caught lying on day ONE about the thanks but no thanks bridge to nowhere statement. No one questioned her about the bridge. She brought it up. Clueless. On a major league scale.

Palin's target should've been George Bush all along. Not Obama. She would've won more support by supportin Obama. Praising him for wanting to make a differnce in America, becaue that's what she wanted to do.

But, she could've pointed out, that I have more executive experience then him.

Had she come out of the gate with a strong statement, she could've simply referred all questions about herself to her first statement and then been oly willing to discuss the future and the changes she intended to make with McCain.

Instead, she refused to answer questions and do interviews, which proved she had something to hide. Like intelligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Wilmington, NC
8,577 posts, read 7,795,489 times
Reputation: 835
um, most politicians do. who did you vote for? change is the generic term politicians use to confuse the sheep.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kid Quake View Post
She was running on change and country first. If you wanna be a sheep that don't come out saying that you're going to be different. She got caught lying on day ONE about the thanks but no thanks bridge to nowhere statement. No one questioned her about the bridge. She brought it up. Clueless. On a major league scale.

Palin's target should've been George Bush all along. Not Obama. She would've won more support by supportin Obama. Praising him for wanting to make a differnce in America, becaue that's what she wanted to do.

But, she could've pointed out, that I have more executive experience then him.

Had she come out of the gate with a strong statement, she could've simply referred all questions about herself to her first statement and then been oly willing to discuss the future and the changes she intended to make with McCain.

Instead, she refused to answer questions and do interviews, which proved she had something to hide. Like intelligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:32 PM
 
251 posts, read 411,423 times
Reputation: 88
I voted for Dion. He lost.

McCain and Plain ran on bumper sticker slogans. It was pathetic. The worse run campaign in modern day histoy, and possibly in all of history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Wilmington, NC
8,577 posts, read 7,795,489 times
Reputation: 835
at the same time, you are describing barack obama. they are all bumper sticker slogan candidates. back to topic though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kid Quake View Post
I voted for Dion. He lost.

McCain and Plain ran on bumper sticker slogans. It was pathetic. The worse run campaign in modern day histoy, and possibly in all of history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,097,983 times
Reputation: 1651
Quote:
Originally Posted by etta View Post
"drill baby drill" = ugh!
?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,068 posts, read 10,097,983 times
Reputation: 1651
It's getting a little too repetitive in here, with not much to add. Bye.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:53 PM
 
251 posts, read 411,423 times
Reputation: 88
Why was Obama so inspiring then? It wasn't becausehe's black. It was because it is believable while Sarah admits the only difference between her and a pitbull was lipstick. Her goal was to win over Dems and independants, not Pubs. Her patheitc approach was laughable since most Dems areagainst the war, which Plain wants to continue losing.

She's hated because she's hateable. And a sheep. Baaaaaaa!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Wilmington, NC
8,577 posts, read 7,795,489 times
Reputation: 835
obama was inspiring to those who supported him. this is about palin though. peace.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kid Quake View Post
Why was Obama so inspiring then? It wasn't becausehe's black. It was because it is believable while Sarah admits the only difference between her and a pitbull was lipstick. Her goal was to win over Dems and independants, not Pubs. Her patheitc approach was laughable since most Dems areagainst the war, which Plain wants to continue losing.

She's hated because she's hateable. And a sheep. Baaaaaaa!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2008, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,763 posts, read 39,583,552 times
Reputation: 8243
Quote:
Originally Posted by expgc View Post
Good point! By witch doctors do you mean similiar to the psychic fortune tellers, spiritualists and muses that liberals like to trust in?
Liberals

like


NANCY REAGAN????????

*boom*
*pow*
*domergurl takes a bow*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top