Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I guess that now Maddow has enough money so she doesn't have to mow the lawn of her girlfriend...
She's moving up in the world...
You bumped a nearly year-old thread to post that? Sickening.
Quote:
Originally Posted by domergurl
She's as whip smart as Keith is biting smart. Both well educated ... Rachel is a Rhodes scholar, articulate and well informed. While Keith doesn't have opposition on, Rachel welcomes them ... she put Dick Armey in his place and I love how she and Pat Buchanan discuss and debate without raising voices.
I love that about her, too. She actually researches her subjects and fact checks, as opposed to just spewing talking points. And I love how she welcomes and challenges the opposition. She also destroyed Tim Phillips of Americans for Prosperity.
5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck– 3,421,000 viewers (723,000) (1,478,000)
Situation Room—809,000 viewers (150,000) (282,000)
Hardball w/ Chris Matthews—580,000 viewers (169,000) (259,000)
Fast Money—209,000 viewers (a scratch w/46,000) (92,000)
Prime News–290,000 viewers (109,000) (145,000)
6PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Special Report with Bret Baier– 2,273,000 viewers (493,000) (988,000)
Situation Room—739,000 viewers (145,000) (259,000)
Ed Show—652,000 viewers (177,000) (298,000)
Mad Money —198,000 viewers (71,000) (96,000)
Prime News — 307,000 viewers (111,000) (121,000)
7PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64) The Fox Report w/ Shep –2,201,000 viewers (538,000) (999,000)
Lou Dobbs Tonight—673,000 viewers (152,000) (270,000)
Hardball w/ C. Matthews—805,000 viewers (217,000) (368,000)
Kudlow Report — a scratch w/119,000 viewers (a scratch w/31,000) (a scratch w/40,000)
Issues– 401,000 viewers (151,000) (225,000)
8PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64) The O’Reilly Factor– 4,039,000 viewers (1,059,000) (1,844,000)
Campbell Brown – 693,000 viewers (173,000) (284,000)
Countdown w/ K. Olbermann – 1,395,000 viewers (442,000) (765,000)
1 Year Later: Recovery– a scratch w/ 87,000 viewers (a scratch w/ 37,000) (a scratch w/ 39,000)
Nancy Grace – 870,000 viewers (292,000) (428,000)
9 PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64) Hannity –3,451 ,000 viewers (922,000) (1,502,000)
Larry King Live —1,355,000 viewers (318,000) (582,000) Rachel Maddow Show —1,369,000 viewers (386,000) (682,000)
House of Cards – a scratch w/ 124,000 viewers (a scratch w/ 43,000) (56,000)
Issues- 630,000 viewers (230,000) (302,000)
10 PM P2+ (25-54) (35-64) On The Record w/ Greta Van Susteren —2,785,000 viewers (804,000) (1,356,000)
Anderson Cooper 360 —1,086,000 viewers (295,000) (467,000) Countdown w/ K. Olbermann – 729,000 viewers (307,000) (385,000)
House of Cards – 129,000 viewers (58,000) (70,000)
Nancy Grace –448,000 viewers (222,000) (213,000)
11 PM P2+ (25-54) (35-64) The O’Reilly Factor —2,231,000 viewers (770,000) (1,192,000)
Anderson Cooper 360 —684,000 viewers (201,000) (358,000)
Rachel Maddow Show —518,000 viewers (228,000) (310,000)
Mad Money – a scratch w/ 80,000 viewers (a scratch w/ 32,000) (61,000)
Showbiz Tonight– 447,000 viewers (263,000) (249,000)
- For other days cable news ratings click here.
I mean look here Bill had the third and fourth most watched shows on ALL cable TV. Sean and Alan rounded out the top ten. Missing from this is ANY show on CNN or MSNBC. Their are a lot of haters on this board.
Rachel Maddow almost requires a college degree to watch. Same thing with Olbermann. Fox news only requires a cold beer and a remote. The most popular show is going to work at the level of its audience. Fox news' logic can be dissected in under 30 seconds and it is almost always faulty.
If having someone with the opposite view as a guest is important, I've seen Rachel do such a thing and in a most tactful manner. Fox news only brings people on to holler at them so the average American psychopath can get a kick out of expressing their misplaced rage through the interviewer.
(Finally, if Rachel wasn't a lesbian, and I wasn't a gay man, I'd be all over her. I find her stunning.)
Oh dear. More false ratings=quality claims. More attacks on someone because of sexual orientation. More attacks on intelligence of two people who are clearly intelligent.
1. Doesn't matter how many people watch any show, it doesn't mean it's a good show. Or network.
2. The degree of hatred expressed by some posters towards gays/lesbians has reminded me that when homosexuality was still considered a psychiatric disorder, extreme hatred toward homosexuals was considered a symptom of latent homosexuality -- homosexual tendencies and desires deeply hidden and repressed.
3. Anyone who denies that either Maddow or Olbermann is intelligent is either lying because they just have to say nasty things about the other side or is simply not bright enough to recognize intelligence when they see it. Or maybe they never listened to either of them and are just repeating more right wing lies....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
