Quote:
Originally Posted by Sci Fi Fan
Newsflash: most biologists are liberals. Just as most theoretical physicists are liberals, most mathematicians are liberals, most climatologists are liberals and most medical researchers are liberals. The profession of using empirical observation to figure out how stuff works and conservatism just don't mix very well.
And life does begin at conception. Actually, sperm is technically alive. And there's nothing we can do to stop the countless trillions that die every day. Why would your god create life, which according to you have immediate person-hood regardless of sentience, that dies in the trillions without any way for us to prevent it?
|
What does god have to do with science? You are a scientific illiterate also, so don't rag on global warmist deniers. An individual human life begins at conception; that is a fact. What damage additional CO2 will do is all guessswork.
You are a life begins at conception denier so shut up about everyone else.
F.cking hilarious, everytime I bring up the scientific fact that an individual human life begins at conception liberals turn to religion or politics to argue against a known scientific fact. Then they claim conservatives are anti-science because only a small minority of scientists disagree with the global warming hypothesis.
If you understand the difference between getting a haircut and getting beheaded ya might just understand the difference between sperm and a fertilized egg.
It is sad I have to teach liberals what they should have learned in middle school.