Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I cant believe he lost either, since alot of those votes that acorn found and other liberals groups found had alot of wrong dates on them or did not follow election laws here in minnesota.
take all those illegal votes out and see how frankenstien does then.
coleman shall contest them in court and the winner of MN state senate race might not be decided for months.
I also notice how alot of liberal senators congratulate frankenstein on his win, but I bet if it would be on the other foot, they would be screaming for a recount again and again.
Right, just like in Florida during Gore's run. I seem to remember you righties calling the dems a bunch of crybabys & to get on w/it. What, is it a different story when the shoe's on your foot now?
Several differences:
1. Every recount in Florida netted more votes for Bush.
2. There are several hundred Minnesota ballots - ballots that are overwhelmingly for Coleman - that have been disallowed by the courts. I assume it's for legitimate reasons, but I'm not sure.
That said, let's get on with it. Franken is a complete dirtbag and doofus. He is a pathetic joke. And I have absolutely no idea how anybody could have voted for him. All of my family & friends, who still live in Minnesota, cannot figure out how he got even 100 votes in the whole state. Even so, he was elected to the Senate, so that's where he'll be.
Sounds like a troll thread... I have a number of reasons why..
#1. No article. If he is a sore loser, why can't we have an article so we can read a bit more about him? I don't judge before I know a bit more about someone, and even though I should have kept track of this story, I didn't. I am probably not alone.
#2. Sandpaper is coarse. You meant course.
By the way, this guy isn't even all that bad. I have seen much much worse. And for the record, if you need a lesson on what a sore loser is, perhaps you should revisit the 2000 election year?
Why is it so very hard for you to see how this election is very crooked? Is it hard to figure out that when hundreds of votes are "found" and some have the wrong election date stamped on them (not a smart Democrat who can't even cheat right) that there is something very, very wrong with that election?
Cheating during elections is not something that should be looked at in a partisan way. Cheating during elections is something that hurts all Americans in a bipartisan way. If cheaters get away with things, then the cheating just goes on and on and on.....
Just a point that should probably be in another thread- the electoral college should be done away with and popular vote should always, always rule. But that popular vote needs to be fair no matter what. In the case of Minn. with Franken and Coleman, something is very fishy there. Any moron can see that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
