Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:05 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,653,348 times
Reputation: 2829

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
So who should the gub'ment kill next. Ever heard of the T4 program?

Learn your history.
Godwin's law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."

How to Win Any Argument On the Internet

Quote:
4) AT SOME POINT IN TIME, CLAIM THE OTHER PERSON IS A NAZI. Every, and I repeat EVERY Internet argument should involve at least one comparison to either Hitler or the Nazis. This is one of the most basic requirements of an average Internet debate, and although ignorant outsiders may find it silly to compare a person arguing on the Internet with an individual responsible for the execution of millions, this action represents one of the most traditional pillars of every online debate. The earliest recorded instance of the infamous "Nazi clause" can be traced to Greg "suprsk8r" Henderson, who used Q-Link in July of 1986 to call Alex "Dr_Millions" Wilson "the Adolf Hitler of preseason NCAA fantasy league basketball" over People Connection.

FLAME: uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh no i dont think taht GI Joe could beat the Transformers in a battle cuz Optomus prime would like totally kill the **** out of duke and waht do u know about anything anyway u reteard

INCORRECT RESPONSE: Dear Internet cur, I'll have you know that your churlish actions and replies reek of an insolent ignoramus! Why, upon reading your cretinous claim, I let out a mighty scoff and nearly choked upon my brandy!

CORRECT RESPONSE: F U HITLER!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:06 PM
 
Location: USA
396 posts, read 923,259 times
Reputation: 128
Wow, Pelosi is going chinese way! Amazing how communist-maoist ideology perforated her liberal mind. Next step- she'll try to regulate number of kids a family could have. It's so embarassing to have a speaker like she.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:06 PM
 
419 posts, read 602,547 times
Reputation: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkb0305 View Post
I did not call it pork. I pointed out how it might help people and states in this awful economy. economic stimulus can mean more than just job creation.
It very much is pork and a lot of it. So the economy can grow without creating more jobs?

The unemployment all these people are claiming is not hurting the states. but hey lets help people get abortions and condoms.

With the national debt at what is it and the fact we are having to borrow money to make this package even happen. Its only focus should be on those things that will create jobs and help the economy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:10 PM
 
790 posts, read 1,732,567 times
Reputation: 482
Quote:
Nice to see a multi-pronged long view approach to big issues instead of just some ham-handed short term useless band-aid type fix.
It's about time.
I would say that this sounds like a band-aid fix to a larger issue. The US, as with many other western countries, have aging populations which means that fewer children will mean a greater burden on the few left.
Also, I don't agree that what is proposed by Pelosi is a "stimulus."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:15 PM
 
492 posts, read 961,594 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plovedupont
But how is that going to help the economy? That is the question
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtoli View Post
Less children born, less strain on Governmental assistance/resources. Pretty cut and dry.
So we could just ship all the liberals to China and resolve the issue and invalidate your assumption that there would be strain on governmental assistance/resources. Not EVERYBODY does the government beggar thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:16 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,133,412 times
Reputation: 6195
What on earth is there to criticize about this?! First you all complain of willy-nilly breeding* and concomitant misappropriation of your tax dollars. Now you complain that breeding will be controlled and your tax dollars will be redirected someplace you can't as self-righteously whine about. Make up your "minds"!

* hat tip to Upton
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:22 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,137,880 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plovedupont View Post
Do you really have to ask what could happen with girls wearing clothes that barely cover their butt.

I didnt say anyone was going to be forced it was a comment to other posters post about we need to control the population.
NOW you just said we need to control the population!!!!!




O M G !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
8,998 posts, read 14,779,580 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Neanderthal? Who's killing babies?
I don't think it's the Dems....
I thought it was an embryo or fetus up until 20 weeks....

In any case, at least the Dems care about babies once they're born.
The Repubs will just slap the kid and ask them to provide for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:27 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,146,706 times
Reputation: 32726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plovedupont View Post
It very much is pork and a lot of it. So the economy can grow without creating more jobs?

The unemployment all these people are claiming is not hurting the states. but hey lets help people get abortions and condoms.

With the national debt at what is it and the fact we are having to borrow money to make this package even happen. Its only focus should be on those things that will create jobs and help the economy
show me where I said that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2009, 01:27 PM
 
8,762 posts, read 11,567,486 times
Reputation: 3398
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
Social Liberals just make no sense to me.

If you destroy a Bald Eagle egg they put you in jail.

If you abort a potential human they hail you as a hero.

Aren't humans worth more than eagles?
Really? When? Where? I never heard of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top