Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2009, 12:35 PM
 
Location: The Heartland
4,458 posts, read 4,190,417 times
Reputation: 760

Advertisements

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution

Conservative News and Reporting
"News for the Rest of Us"
Michele Chang

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.

"The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself." the spokesman said, "At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution."

The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes to far.

"Technically, we can't talk about it before it becomes official policy." the spokesman continued. "However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass."

Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.

"The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib."

"We expect a lot of flak over this," the classified memo continues. "But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control."

The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years.

This is very bothersome, I am not sure what to think of it. It seems that this is the sort of thing that could put the military in a must choose situation and I am not sure they would or should pledge loyalty to the POTUS instead of the constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2009, 12:41 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,656,890 times
Reputation: 2829
Posted on a blog and nowhere else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Y'all would make Lee Atwater very proud.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,589,115 times
Reputation: 10616
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtoli View Post
Posted on a blog and nowhere else.
Just wait--someone will enter it onto Wikipedia, and then half the country will be quoting it as something authoritative!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 01:32 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,844,914 times
Reputation: 9283
I don't believe it.... not even for a second..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 01:34 PM
 
419 posts, read 602,671 times
Reputation: 82
This has to be a joke right
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 01:35 PM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,003 posts, read 12,583,387 times
Reputation: 8921
Semi real source needed. Ill settle for CNBC even.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 01:39 PM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,634,639 times
Reputation: 2893
Horrible if true.....I would like to see more hard evidence, though.

But if it were true I would think we all will be unindated with lots and lots of proof (i.e. leaks) the military and the Pentagon will not take that laying down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Southern Maryland
172 posts, read 278,983 times
Reputation: 67
If it were true (doubtful) more than half the military would walk away. No way anyone I know serving (including myself) would ever take an oath like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2009, 01:44 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,141,005 times
Reputation: 6195
"Sources"?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top