Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Obama remove the 10% penalty for early withdrawal of IRA funds?
NO 7 14.89%
YES - for those making under $50,000/yr 7 14.89%
YES - for those making under $100,000/yr 22 46.81%
YES - for those making under $500,000/yr 11 23.40%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2009, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
3,564 posts, read 5,515,554 times
Reputation: 1497

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moth View Post
No, it should never be removed except for the most dire circumstances. IRA accounts are for retirement. Emergency savings is for emergencies.

This would be another reason for people to engage in fiscally reckless behavior.

I agree. Which would in turn lead to more people wanting th government to take care of them.

 
Old 02-06-2009, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
3,564 posts, read 5,515,554 times
Reputation: 1497
Quote:
Originally Posted by freefall View Post
Maybe if it targeted the middle class, the super-rich dont need more dough, unless maybe one of the legs broke off of their commode-with-legs.

Seriously, its needed for those desperate to save their home, and its a good investment tool for those who want to pick up a investment property

Why bail out irresponsible homeowners? I'm in a group that's really getting screwed here.

Graduated college in 2005. Didnt buy a home I cant afford. Have been renting since then. No credit cards. Just paying off my student loan.
 
Old 02-06-2009, 12:46 PM
 
2,541 posts, read 2,738,618 times
Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlottePirateFan View Post
Why bail out irresponsible homeowners? I'm in a group that's really getting screwed here.

Graduated college in 2005. Didnt buy a home I cant afford. Have been renting since then. No credit cards. Just paying off my student loan.
Not about 'irresponsible homeowners', those have just 'walked away' by now anyway. It would target responsible homeowners or wanna-be homeowners, who could use the money to help the economy and banks by buying up some of the bank owned properties on the cheap, and maybe a car. The stimulus money would not have to come from taxpayers, it would come from IRA accounts. Mutual fund companies might not like it - too bad.
 
Old 02-06-2009, 01:12 PM
 
6,757 posts, read 8,284,458 times
Reputation: 10152
I wish we had been able to leave our retirement funds intact. Unfortunately, it was necessary to use them to live.
 
Old 02-06-2009, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,765 posts, read 11,000,014 times
Reputation: 2830
Quote:
Originally Posted by jenn02674 View Post
Please clarify because that last sentence I quoted is a bit confusing. Are you saying you made 40% in 2007 or that you bought them in 2007 and have made 40% since then? I did very well myself in 2007. 2008 up to now, not so much!

Wouldn't the next year be a good time to invest if you had the money to do so?

No, that was only for 2007. 2008 was a wreck but that was obviously an out of the ordinary year. Most of the time, a good fund will see a modest return.

Right now is an excellent time to invest if you have the means to do so.
 
Old 02-06-2009, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MO
5,765 posts, read 11,000,014 times
Reputation: 2830
Quote:
Originally Posted by freefall View Post
Not about 'irresponsible homeowners', those have just 'walked away' by now anyway. It would target responsible homeowners or wanna-be homeowners, who could use the money to help the economy and banks by buying up some of the bank owned properties on the cheap, and maybe a car. The stimulus money would not have to come from taxpayers, it would come from IRA accounts. Mutual fund companies might not like it - too bad.

So, you are suggesting everyone drain their retirement to spend money now. That's fine and all but what happens in 30, 40, 50 years when people dont have enough money to retire and Social Security is gone?

Also, people have suffered losses of anywhere from 20% to 80%. You dont sell securities when you have suffered those kind of losses unless it is a dire emergency. That is poor decision making.

Buying a house isnt a bad idea, it is just as good of an investment as any. However, spending your retirement on a car is a poor idea. A car is a depreciating asset.
 
Old 02-06-2009, 06:00 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,811,723 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by freefall View Post
Not about 'irresponsible homeowners', those have just 'walked away' by now anyway. It would target responsible homeowners or wanna-be homeowners, who could use the money to help the economy and banks by buying up some of the bank owned properties on the cheap, and maybe a car. The stimulus money would not have to come from taxpayers, it would come from IRA accounts. Mutual fund companies might not like it - too bad.
I am seeing houses that were sold for $200k+ a few years ago, going for $70k now. If the 10% penalty was removed, I would probably buy one, rent it out, and wait for it to double. It would easily beat the return on stocks, because there is a solid return, along with eventual appreaciation.
 
Old 02-06-2009, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Way upstate NY - Where the snow flys
1,130 posts, read 1,538,732 times
Reputation: 1219
We all hope real estate will appreciate, but we also hope 401k investments will appreciate at the same rate. So which is the better investment, - Who Knows.
Does anyone realize the S & P & Dow hit a high in March of 2000. I think the 24th the S&P (which track closely with mutual funds and 401ks) hit an all time high of 1542 and went steadily down hill until 9/11/01 after which it went sharply down to 900 or so and slowly climbed back to 1300 in oct 07 when it started back down again until the bank and brokerage house failures when it dipped sharply to a modern low of 825 and today ended up at 868.60 and although it may take a few years and expecting history to repeat itself will climb back to the 1542 of March 2000.
The 825 or 868 is the best thing that could happen for the young people (under 45) in 401ks. Your buying low. To take it out now regardless if the 10% were forgiven is not wise - your selling low. Lesave it there. For most it will make up a large part of your retirement.
 
Old 02-07-2009, 04:19 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,811,723 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaffer View Post
We all hope real estate will appreciate, but we also hope 401k investments will appreciate at the same rate. So which is the better investment, - Who Knows.
Does anyone realize the S & P & Dow hit a high in March of 2000. I think the 24th the S&P (which track closely with mutual funds and 401ks) hit an all time high of 1542 and went steadily down hill until 9/11/01 after which it went sharply down to 900 or so and slowly climbed back to 1300 in oct 07 when it started back down again until the bank and brokerage house failures when it dipped sharply to a modern low of 825 and today ended up at 868.60 and although it may take a few years and expecting history to repeat itself will climb back to the 1542 of March 2000.
The 825 or 868 is the best thing that could happen for the young people (under 45) in 401ks. Your buying low. To take it out now regardless if the 10% were forgiven is not wise - your selling low. Lesave it there. For most it will make up a large part of your retirement.
My logic is this - if you can withdraw $70k with no penalty, and buy a house that you can rent for $700/mo, you are getting a 12% return, while waiting for your asset to double, which it eventually will. There is no way in hell that you can find that sort of return in the stock market.
 
Old 02-07-2009, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,763,471 times
Reputation: 3587
I dunno if I like that or not. Maybe just for this year only it might be OK to draw out no more than a certain percentage.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top