Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-10-2009, 03:45 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,290,211 times
Reputation: 18436

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Papa Mike’s Blog » Blog Archive » I Want A Divorce! (http://www.papamiket.com/?p=14306 - broken link)

Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists, and Obama supporters..

We have stuck together since the late 1950’s, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know, we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but, sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot, and will not ever agree on what is right, so let’s just end it on friendly terms. We can smile, chalk it up to irreconcilable differences, and go our own way.

Here is a model separation agreement:

Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friend ly agr eement. After that it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.

We don’t like redistributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we’ll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA, and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore, and Rosie O’Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them) .

We’ll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart, and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies, and illegal aliens. We’ll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO’s, and rednecks. We’ll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood.

You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we’ll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us. You can have the peaceniks, and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we’ll help provide them security.

We’ll keep our Judeo-Christian values. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, and Shirley McClaine. You can also have the U.N. But we will no longer be paying the bill.

We’ll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks, and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find.

You can give everyone healthcare, if you can find any practicing doctors. We’ll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We’ll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I’m sure you’ll be happy to substitute "Imagine", "I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing", "Kum Ba Ya", or "We Are the World".

We’ll practice trickle down economics, and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you we’ll keep our history, our name, and our flag.

Would you agree to this? If so please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots, and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I’ll bet you ANWAR which one of us will need whose help in 15 years.

Sincerely, John J. Wall
Law Student and an American

P.S. Also, please take Barbara Streisand & Jane Fonda.
No thanks for posting the ramblings of an absolute sucker who deludes himself into thinking that he is both intelligent, relevant, and that his opinion is of value. Remnants of a Republican president named Dubya who felt that "dreams take wing" I suppose.

 
Old 11-10-2009, 03:49 PM
 
1,712 posts, read 3,090,011 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexus View Post
No thanks for posting the ramblings of an absolute sucker who deludes himself into thinking that he is both intelligent, relevant, and that his opinion is of value. Remnants of a Republican president named Dubya who felt that "dreams take wing" I suppose.

No, the real sucker is someone who believes that Obama is the answer. We all know that he was elected only because there was no viable conservative candidate out there on the other side.

Libs will always be hateful and angry no matter what happens so it is best to ignore that group and move on...... divorce time
 
Old 11-10-2009, 03:54 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 1,521,542 times
Reputation: 790
Palin is a hard working hocky mom? Non of the hocky mom's I know quit their jobs when the going gets tough. Real hocky mom's are heros. Palin is just an ignorant whiner who is not willing to do the hard work to reach her goal.
 
Old 11-10-2009, 04:00 PM
 
1,712 posts, read 3,090,011 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by newhandle View Post
Palin is a hard working hocky mom? Non of the hocky mom's I know quit their jobs when the going gets tough. Real hocky mom's are heros. Palin is just an ignorant whiner who is not willing to do the hard work to reach her goal.

Obama is not a hard worker either ...... he just rode affirmative action to where he is and the "wanting to be so tolerant" white guilt crowd vote that doesn't get it

The way you make it sound, Palin is a liberal since you used the top 3 words that are associated with Libs

Ignorant
Whiner
lazy

We really need a divorce
 
Old 11-10-2009, 05:46 PM
 
737 posts, read 1,172,091 times
Reputation: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by machiavelli1 View Post
Obama is not a hard worker either ...... he just rode affirmative action to where he is and the "wanting to be so tolerant" white guilt crowd vote that doesn't get it
That's exactly the reason we have had so many minority presidents before...

no wait
 
Old 11-10-2009, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,594,662 times
Reputation: 9975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Papa Mike’s Blog » Blog Archive » I Want A Divorce! (http://www.papamiket.com/?p=14306 - broken link)

Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists, and Obama supporters..

We have stuck together since the late 1950’s, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know, we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but, sadly, this relationship has run its course. Our two ideological sides of America cannot, and will not ever agree on what is right, so let’s just end it on friendly terms. We can smile, chalk it up to irreconcilable differences, and go our own way.

Here is a model separation agreement:

Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friend ly agr eement. After that it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.

We don’t like redistributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we’ll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA, and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore, and Rosie O’Donnell (You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them) .

We’ll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart, and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies, and illegal aliens. We’ll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO’s, and rednecks. We’ll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood.

You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we’ll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us. You can have the peaceniks, and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we’ll help provide them security.

We’ll keep our Judeo-Christian values. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, and Shirley McClaine. You can also have the U.N. But we will no longer be paying the bill.

We’ll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks, and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find.

You can give everyone healthcare, if you can find any practicing doctors. We’ll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right. We’ll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I’m sure you’ll be happy to substitute "Imagine", "I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing", "Kum Ba Ya", or "We Are the World".

We’ll practice trickle down economics, and you can give trickle up poverty your best shot. Since it often so offends you we’ll keep our history, our name, and our flag.

Would you agree to this? If so please pass it along to other like minded liberal and conservative patriots, and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I’ll bet you ANWAR which one of us will need whose help in 15 years.

Sincerely, John J. Wall
Law Student and an American

P.S. Also, please take Barbara Streisand & Jane Fonda.
Sorry we have custody, don't let the door hit you in the butt
 
Old 11-10-2009, 06:38 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,290 posts, read 87,078,539 times
Reputation: 55549
sure you wana get rid of me. just like pinochillo wanted to get rid of his cricket
help me out didnt i sit in my living room and watch george bush on TV demand we do a bank bailout?
what did you tell me? sit down shut up and respect the office.
 
Old 11-10-2009, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,863 posts, read 8,140,756 times
Reputation: 4590
It would be nice to feel like we could have real choice here in the United States. Splitting the country up into multiple entities would be a step in the right direction. We could still be considered the same country with the same military for DEFENSE purposes. But almost all other facets of the government could be operated via the new "states". Like health care, immigration/border control, and trade regulations/tariffs.

There cannot be completely open borders between the sections of the country, or you'll have abuse of each states sovereignty. You would lose a little bit of "freedom" to move about the country as easily as you do now. But you would gain a lot more choice in where you wanted to be.

Texas for instance could completely close its borders to all Mexicans and have free reign to deport all illegals while simultaneously building a huge fence along the border, while having private healthcare, pull out of Nafta and the WTO, and placing heavy tariffs on Chinese-made goods. Open up off-shore drilling in the Gulf, ban unions, ban abortion, ban Islam, teach Christianity in schools, and abolish the income tax.

California could open the borders to all Mexicans, grant amnesty to illegals already here. They could put in a single payer healthcare system, legalize marijuana(and more?), fund abortions and sex education, heavily expand their current mass transit system, push through cap and trade, and ban religion from all government entities.

In the beginning you could just decide what side you wanted to be on. But after that, immigration rules would be enforced.
 
Old 11-10-2009, 06:42 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,582 posts, read 9,739,995 times
Reputation: 4172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexus View Post
No thanks for posting the ramblings of an absolute sucker who deludes himself into thinking that he is both intelligent, relevant, and that his opinion is of value. Remnants of a Republican president named Dubya who felt that "dreams take wing" I suppose.
In other words, you can't refute any of the points he made, nor share in the humor he used to make them. So you attack the messenger instead, insult him, call him names, and then try to change the subject to George W. Bush.

SO typical of liberal responses......!
 
Old 11-10-2009, 06:49 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,290,211 times
Reputation: 18436
Quote:
Originally Posted by machiavelli1 View Post
No, the real sucker is someone who believes that Obama is the answer. We all know that he was elected only because there was no viable conservative candidate out there on the other side.

Libs will always be hateful and angry no matter what happens so it is best to ignore that group and move on...... divorce time
This coming from a party that stunk to high heaven for 8 years. Obvious that you regressives were "ignored" in the last election, yes? So too today. Hope you get better.

"Hateful" is what I call that ridiculous failed military effort on a people that Dubya and his band of dimwits knew little about. First administration in the history of the world to drop a trillion dollars and LOSE to an opponent who was inferior militarily. What suckers.

Stand aside while President Obama continues to do a great job. Regressives are of no use here.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top