Quote:
Originally Posted by allydriver
Incentives and competition drive excellence.
Tenure and unions are dumbing down the system.
|
That might be the case in some sector of private industry but not in inherently government systems. Where are these teachers who can't get jobs that would be driving competition? There aren't that many out there. The job is too hard and thankless; parents are more of a problem than the children in many cases. The people who do teach have a calling (most of them), because that job just isn't easy.
Please provide some good information about tenure and unions dumbing down the system.
Seriously, I’m interested in the studies and proof that you seem to have have.
When I went to school we had up to 35-40 kids per class.
But I’m old, and we were expected to behave and listen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerdin
Nuts. Having an educated population is good for the country and for the economy. What is selfish is people who refuse to contribute to society's joint social needs.
|
I think most people shouldn’t reproduce. I’m very clear about that. Yet I understand the need to support schools.
I attended private schools for grades 1-12, am childfree, and understand the need to provide education to the citizenry. I was a public school teacher at one time in my life.
It only makes sense. NCLB has destroyed education.
One of the things I don’t like in high school environments is that you have magnet schools for drama, the arts, separate ones for science, etc.
I think we need to get our kids a good basic education to get out in the world.
In Germany and other European countries, there is an apprenticeship program where kids who are not college bound, but going into the trades are trained in their field.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oscottscotto
But in today's reality, there is no good reason to have 40 in a classroom. I'm not going to go find studies to back me up (although through past research I know they exist), but "studies show" that the 18-22 relm (or less) is the typical "number" for a healthy learning environment - before it becomes a convoluted, unhealthy one (25+).
I am also a living testiment to this. My smaller classes (usually 17-23 students) always severely outperformed my larger ones (30-38). Keep in mind these were all the same grade students, same subject, same "regular" status (not advanced), and same classroom with same teacher.
|
If parents were involved in public education, and kids behaved as they should in class, you could get by with larger classrooms. It’s not the system, it’s the lack of parenting and discipline. We’ve dumbed down education to the lowest common denominator so that little Sally or Bob doesn’t “feel” dumb. A lot of people are dumb. Face it. Everyone doesn’t/shouldn’t get a prize. Perhaps our ever growing population is also pushing the costs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475
I would be really happy to dump money into school by the **** load if we would move away from this "it's not my fault" attitude. I haven't learned a single thing I refused to take responsibility for creating. I would also be more apt to want to invest money into school if it wasn't so clearly leveraged to the liberal way of thinking.... schools shouldn't be indoctrinating any children into an ideological way of thinking.
|
How about something other than your opinion on this. I don’t think schools are liberal at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu
Of course, smaller classes are better, but only up to a point. And the same goes for Obama wanting the quality of teachers to improve. However, the best teachers in the world and a one teacher to 22 student ratio aren't going to help the students in the inner city schools... not if those students are allowed to get away with beating up their teachers, not if their parents aren't going to make them have a better attitude towards their studies.
|
Wow, nice racist/classist statement. How many teachers are getting beat up? I’ve never heard of that in my hometown, also a large metropolitan area.
Rich white neighborhoods are not exempt from behavioral problems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Convert 54
The original fight which got it removed was over a restriction that would have prevented the money being used at ANY school that allowed any form of prayer or religious service, and that was not b=meerly aimed at the class rooms type, but after school functions, graduation, private and public
|
Funds should not be going to any schools that practice any type of religion or religious training outside of a higher level world religions type of history class.
Religion is for home and church.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475
Plenty of room for the next fear driven bailout to put useless items in. And you guys thought the culture of fear was gone with Bush and his homeland warnings. That was really just crying wolf...
|
The reality of the situation is that the US economy is a mess.
We should all be concerned.
Some people understand what a mess we’re in. Others don’t.
http://images.politico.com/global/09...artoon_600.jpg