Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is this recession worse than the 70s & 80s recessions?
Worse 54 63.53%
Better 26 30.59%
About the same 5 5.88%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2009, 08:46 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,692,979 times
Reputation: 22474

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
You have no idea, no logic, and are showcasing a strong case of being completely out of touch. At least you're persistent and consistent.

If you think that is the reason we're in an economic doo-doo, apparently, lack of learning from mistakes goes with it.
Try to educate yourself:

t r u t h o u t | Dean Baker | Recession Time! The Housing Bubble Bursts the Economy

Housing bubble's burst could cost 1 million jobs and cause a recession, experts say : North County Times - Californian 11-13-2005 (http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/11/13/business/news/20_51_4611_12_05.txt - broken link)

Housing Bubble Trouble

Check the dates of some of these articles. You know, there were plenty of people that saw all this coming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2009, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Yes, it's the debt that's driving this. People unable to pay their subprime mortgages kicked this off, and of course the banks that gave out those loans were most affected. It's becoming like dominoes falling.

Personal and government debt brought about by out-of-control spending, spending money that doesn't exist. Gambling the entire future away.
Subprime mortgages have been around for a long time. You might have sources that "saw" this coming 2-3 years ago. I heard it five years ago, and that was the beginning of the mess that stands today.

While the seeds were sown in 1999, with deregulation of the financial system, the policies that followed added fertilizer to it, while offering shade for rampant growth. One such policy went in effect in 2004, when five giant private financial institutions (none of them exist on their own today) were given relaxed rules to go out and go wild. The relaxed rules involved mindless leveraging, which led likes of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs to take advantage of the "freedom" given to them by Paulson... going ridiculously high to over 30:1 leveraging. Are you going to tell me we can't blame it?

Idiocity has to stop. Free Market shouldn't be confused with Casino Capitalism... except that the money being gambled with belongs to someone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 04:23 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,461,121 times
Reputation: 4799
Crooks got us here. People willing to push no income no asset loans by the butt load got us here. People finding refuge from a busted dot-com bubble got us here. Speculators on wall street jacked up fuel prices which normally rise anyway with new home ownership growth. Two economic downturns in 2000 and 2003 pretty much guaranteed no one wanted to tighten up the belt buckle while the going was good. Now it's busted and now we still have to tighten the belt buckle but now times suck while having to do it. Instead of doing that we are going to try and prop up an economy that was way over priced. Some how the government and it's 17% share of our GDP is going to keep the other 73% afloat in all it's omnipotence.

Quote:
Krugman: But my eye was caught by the following chilling passage (yes, things are so bad that the summarized musings of central bankers can keep you up at night): “All participants anticipated that unemployment would remain substantially above its longer-run sustainable rate at the end of 2011, even absent further economic shocks; a few indicated that more than five to six years would be needed for the economy to converge to a longer-run path characterized by sustainable rates of output growth and unemployment and by an appropriate rate of inflation.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/op...20krugman.html

Recalling historical speeches:
Quote:
Our people are losing that faith, not only in government itself but in the ability as citizens to serve as the ultimate rulers and shapers of our democracy. As a people we know our past and we are proud of it. Our progress has been part of the living history of America, even the world. We always believed that we were part of a great movement of humanity itself called democracy, involved in the search for freedom, and that belief has always strengthened us in our purpose. But just as we are losing our confidence in the future, we are also beginning to close the door on our past.

In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we've discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. We've learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose.

The symptoms of this crisis of the American spirit are all around us. For the first time in the history of our country a majority of our people believe that the next five years will be worse than the past five years. Two-thirds of our people do not even vote. The productivity of American workers is actually dropping, and the willingness of Americans to save for the future has fallen below that of all other people in the Western world.

As you know, there is a growing disrespect for government and for churches and for schools, the news media, and other institutions. This is not a message of happiness or reassurance, but it is the truth and it is a warning.

Last edited by BigJon3475; 02-20-2009 at 04:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 06:54 AM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,480,601 times
Reputation: 3133
Quote:
Originally posted by Bideshi
Worse because it is accelerating and will become a Greater Depression. This will be the worst economic crisis in US history and will threaten the very existence of the US as we know it. A hard rain is going to fall...
Well thank you Chicken Little!

I was born in 1981, so I can't relate to the last BIG recession, but from what I've heard it was worse than this one, with the gas lines, high inflation, unemployment and interest rates. But then my aunt tells me that banks weren't failing back then either. And this doesn't hold a candle to the Great Depression, when people were actually starving. That doesn't mean I'm not worried about the future, and if we are on the brink of getting into a depression, but we still need some perspective.

My question for Depression people: What exactly is the difference between a severe recession and a Depression? Is it just choice of words, or do you have a set criteria?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 07:10 AM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,033,437 times
Reputation: 1464
I think there is some terminology confusion here.. In the 70s we did not have a recession, growth was just incredibly slow. Even worse was inflation, which continued to spike, especially in the late 70s. Those two forces combined create stagflation, and stagflation and other factors crippled economic growth.

In the early 80s, Jimmy Carter and the Federal Reserve pushed to curve inflation using monetary policy (spiking interests rates). The problem was, inflation does not just fix itself overnight, and the early 80s recession was a direct result of the adjustment. Unemployment reached 10%+ and things were looking bad.. However, we bounced back in 1984, with unemployment and inflation dropping rapidly (hence Reagan's second landslide). Because of so called 'Reaganomics' unemployment rates eventually dropped to post-war era levels, and inflation was finally normalized.

In the late 80s, however, we had more problems with the S&L companies (sound familiar?) who did NOT benefit from the reduced inflation (less physical currency). And there was also an issue with the first computerized stock exchanges, leading to stock market crash of Black Monday. However, the economy quickly recovered under H.W. Bush. The problem that later occured was the Gulf War. It put way too much strain on our deficet, and caused massive budget issues.

The current crisis is worse because it is not just one or two causes, but everything piling on at once, a chain reaction if you will...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 12:10 PM
 
1,627 posts, read 3,217,243 times
Reputation: 2066
I don't believe we are in a recession but we are heading for a direction that will bring some memories of one.
The recession of the late 60's, early 70's, late 70's and early 80's, late 80's and early 90's. They were all hinged on different factors. We saw in the late 80's savings and loans collapses.

In the Great Depression, when banks closed up and people lost their money, the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 was created.. It provides deposit insurance, which guarantees the safety of checking and savings deposits in member banks.
So, rest assure if you have your money with a bank, you are protected up to 200K until 2010, at which time, it goes back down to $100K.
There was no unemployment back in the day of the Great Depression.
There were Soup Lines.
Gasoline tokens
Jobs were hard to findl
People ate bread and milk.
Those people who lived on farms in the 30's and grew their own food were in a much better position than those folks in the city.

Today, there is FDIC insurance on savings with banks
Today, there is unemployment
Today, the govt has come to the rescue to help banks and businesses.

We are in for hard times as the economy adjusts. No need to panic. The stock market is going down only because the people lack confidance in their government and the economy.

The economy will all turn around in time. It might take up to 5 years but it will turn around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Harrisonville
1,843 posts, read 2,370,439 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXTwizter View Post
In your opinion is this current recession worse, better or about the same as the recession of the 70s and 80s?

Why This Recession Seems Worse Than '70s and '80s - Real Estate * US * News * Story - CNBC.com

I don't think we are as bad off as we were then, but if things don't improve, and sooner rather than later, then that might change.

What do you think?

It's not as bad, not yet anyway. The unemployment hasn't maxed out yet, and the inflation is just starting. To match the 1970's-1980's, both of those have to reach double digits, and the interest rates have got to also reach double digits. Those recessions didn't have all these people losing their life savings though. That makes this one a little bit "special", and more similar to the Great Depression, but only in that way.

I don't think this is really a case of a sick economy so much as it is of being stolen from.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/UNRATE.txt

Last edited by fatchance2005; 02-20-2009 at 12:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 12:59 PM
 
404 posts, read 560,930 times
Reputation: 111
About the same if not better. The left side has exaggerated this more than anything. Just like global warming
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Is this recession worse than the recession of the 70s-80s?

Much worse. There's very little resemblance. This one is likely to persist for at least two-three more years (quite possibly longer) and we've already "officially" been in it for 14 months and the bottom still isn't in sight. Many millions of people have lost a tremendous amount of their life's savings and will have little opportunity to regain them. The 70s and 80s recessions were nothing in comparison to this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 04:30 PM
 
1,992 posts, read 4,146,572 times
Reputation: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Much worse. There's very little resemblance. This one is likely to persist for at least two-three more years (quite possibly longer) and we've already "officially" been in it for 14 months and the bottom still isn't in sight. Many millions of people have lost a tremendous amount of their life's savings and will have little opportunity to regain them. The 70s and 80s recessions were nothing in comparison to this one.
This is why this one is worse. Millions of these people are the baby boomers who are getting ready to retire. Large amounts of their retirements are gone. Social Security is running out of money. Medicare is not solvent. Increases in the cost of health care are exceeding inflation. It is a perfect storm that will devastate our older citizens. Some will be able to work, but many cannot, and even though they provided for their retirements and did what they should have done to secure them, they are gone.

I am getting ready to move my elderly mother-in-law from an assisted living complex to a really inadequate nursing home because most of her money has been lost in the last several months, and we are not getting the income we were counting on to provide the assisted living place. Even in the cheap retirement home, my wife and I are going to have to subsidize the cost with our money since so much of hers has disappeared, and we are not young. We will be retired soon, and HER retirement is taking our money. The money we have saved has taken a hit. I think we will survive, but what about people who have lost everything through the crooks that stole their investments? At least I have some money left. On AOL today there was an article about a 91 year old who lost everything that he had invested with Madoff. The guy is looking for a job at age 91!

Last edited by JamesAbilene; 02-20-2009 at 04:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top