Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2009, 12:18 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,276,303 times
Reputation: 1893

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUEGRITT View Post
This entire post is from another board.

"It seems that over 500 tons of yellowcake uranium were shipped via planes and a tanker from Iraq to Canada around early July 2008. Read this story about that shipment and then read the links about the shipment. Some very interesting things can be seen and it seems that it is all truth. I wonder why the MSM never reported this secret shipping of that stuff to us.


This has been flying under the radar. This event is factual. I have an increased respect for President Bush. He has taken the heat of being called a liar and a war monger for 5 years while he kept his silence to protect the people of the world. This is truly a display of selfless honor.

On July 5, 2008, the Associated Press (AP) released a story titled: Secret U.S. mission hauls uranium from Iraq .

The opening paragraph is as follows:

The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program, a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium, reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.

See anything wrong with this picture? We have been hearing from the far-left for more than five years how, that Bush lied. Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichment, has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear energy.

It appears that American troops found the 550 metric tons of uranium in 2003 after invading Iraq . They had to sit on this information and the uranium itself, for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it. It was guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000-acre site with large sand beams surrounding the site.

This is vindication for the Bush administration, having been attacked mercilessly by the liberal media and the far-left pundits on the blogosphere. Now that it is proven that President Bush did not lie about Saddam's nuclear ambitions, one would think the mainstream media would report the story. Once the AP released the story, the mainstream media should have picked it up and broadcast it worldwide.

This never happened, due in large part, I believe, to the fact that the mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, the removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy.

Closing the book on Saddam's nuclear legacy. Did Saddam have a nuclear legacy after all? I thought Bush lied. As it turns out, the people who lied were Joe Wilson and his wife.

Valerie Plame engaged in a clear case of nepotism and convinced the CIA to send her husband on a fact-finding mission in February 2002, seeking to determine if Saddam Hussein attempted to buy yellowcake from Niger . The CIA and British intelligence believed Saddam contacted Niger for that purpose but needed proof.

During his trip to Niger , Wilson actually interviewed the former prime minister of Niger , Ibrahim Assane Mayaki. Mayaki told Wilson that in June of 1999, an Iraqi delegation expressed interest in 'expanding commercial relations' for the purposes of purchasing yellowcake.

Wilson chose to overlook Mayaki's remarks and reported to the CIA that there was no evidence of Hussein's wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger .

However, with British intelligence insisting the claim was true, President Bush used that same claim in his State of the Union address in January of 2003.

Outraged by Bush's insistence that the claim was true, Wilson wrote an op-ed in the New York Times in the summer of 2003 slamming Bush.

Wilson did this in spite of the fact that Mayaki said Saddam did try to buy the yellowcake from Niger . The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence disagreed with Wilson and supported Mayaki's claim. This meant nothing to Wilson who was opposed to the Iraq war and thus had ulterior motives in covering up the prime minister's statements.

It was a simple tactic really. If the far-left and their friends in the media could prove Bush lied about Hussein's wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger, it would undermine President Bush's credibility and give them more cause for asking what other lies he may have told.

Yet, the real lie came from Wilson, who interpreted his own meaning from the prime minister's statements and concluded all by himself that the claim of Saddam's attempting to purchase yellowcake was 'unequivocally wrong.' Curiously, the CIA sat on this information and did not inform the CIA Director, who sided with Bush on the yellowcake claim. This was made public in a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report in July 2004.

Valerie Plame also engaged in her own lie campaign by spreading the notion that the Bush administration ousted her as a CIA agent. Never mind that it was Richard Armitage -- no friend of the Bush administration -- who leaked Plame's identity to the press. Never mind that Plame had not been in the field as a CIA agent in some six years.

The truth is, due to their opposition to the war, Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame, the mainstream media and their left-wing friends on the blogosphere engaged in a propaganda campaign to undermine the Bush administration. Now that Saddam's uranium has been made public and is no longer a threat to the world, do you think these aforementioned parties will apologize and admit they were wrong? Don't count on it.

The rest of the American people should hear the truth about Saddam's uranium. It is up to you and me to inform them every chance we get.

Forward this to everyone you know who cares!

As far as the anti-war crowd is concerned, the next time they say that, 'Bush lied,' we should tell them: to, 'Have the yellowcake and eat it too.'

This story was verified, if you want to check it for yourself, click on the links below."
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors...yellowcake.htm
500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says - CNN.com
I think that what's most terrifying about this post is this part:

"I have an increased respect for President Bush. He has taken the heat of being called a liar and a war monger for 5 years while he kept his silence to protect the people of the world. This is truly a display of selfless honor."

I'm sorry, but this is precisely the kind of thing that is tearing this nation apart: this desperate need for a good daddy (whether we're talking about Bush or Obama or any President). In terms of your post, Bush was NEVER invested in "protecting the people of the world." Nor has he EVER displayed "selfless honor."

Americans need to grow a pair, stop looking to their leaders for the parents they never had, commit to educating themselves about the issues--by relying on reputable sources, and then have adult debate about the issues--not about whose daddy is better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2009, 10:37 AM
 
4,465 posts, read 7,998,511 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by paullySC View Post
Even Bill Clinton thought he had WMD's.
.

That was in the early 90's.

By 2000 Powell and Rice were on the news saying Saddam had no ability to make war in the region.

Then came 9/11 and the perfect excuse for an oil raid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 11:00 AM
 
2,265 posts, read 3,732,315 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by geechie north View Post
.

That was in the early 90's.

By 2000 powell and rice were on the news saying saddam had no ability to make war in the region.

Then came 9/11 and the perfect excuse for an oil raid.
1998
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 11:43 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,214,676 times
Reputation: 557
Default MovingForward

Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
I think that what's most terrifying about this post is this part:

"I have an increased respect for President Bush. He has taken the heat of being called a liar and a war monger for 5 years while he kept his silence to protect the people of the world. This is truly a display of selfless honor."

I'm sorry, but this is precisely the kind of thing that is tearing this nation apart: this desperate need for a good daddy (whether we're talking about Bush or Obama or any President). In terms of your post, Bush was NEVER invested in "protecting the people of the world." Nor has he EVER displayed "selfless honor."

Americans need to grow a pair, stop looking to their leaders for the parents they never had, commit to educating themselves about the issues--by relying on reputable sources, and then have adult debate about the issues--not about whose daddy is better.
THAT quote came from this site (forums/opinions).....in re 500 Yellowcake.

The place will astound you!
Gouverneur Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 12:26 PM
 
4,465 posts, read 7,998,511 times
Reputation: 813
Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction | Salon
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:37 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,659,903 times
Reputation: 2829
snopes.com: Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 03:28 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,827,673 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
It became more important after their WMD argumement was exposed as a fraud....then when Saddam was taken out....they argued for nation building.

Let's recap. WMD Lie....Ties to terrorism...Lie....We needed to take Saddam out...lie...Now it's.Nation building....LOL

i wish they stuck to one, but of course americans bought this nonsense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top