Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
Your first problem is that you watch Faux News.
Your second problem is that you're not being very specific. It's very easy to post some blurb without posting the entire response in context.
Third, if you're worried about the government telling you what you should and should not eat, by all means, do NOT move to New York!
Amazing how some people are so quick to say they "don't trust Obama", yet we just went through 8 years of nothing but lies. Give the guy a chance. He can't do worse than Bush.
Obama is the President. No one in the history of the US ever got anywhere CLOSE to the Office of President by telling the truth...they got there by 'crafting' their statements to summarize those they believed the 'people want to hear', and by refusing to discuss those things that might NOT be well-recieved by the public. If we really HAVE to 'beat up' on a President, usually the Press Secretary volunteers to bring us the 'bad news'. Presidents do NOT, normally, take 'heat' for bad news.
For the last eight years, we've gotten used to a particularly 'inept' guy in that office....essentially, when he was being evasive, you could see it. If he had no answer (and he often didn't), he's simply change the subject.
Obama may be 'smoother', and more pleasant to listen to...but I can absoloutely guarantee you ONE thing..he is NOT going to sit for an interview any time soon and "tell the truth"...not to you, nor to me, nor to anyone else, in public. He's going to tell us what he feels he HAS to tell us, in order that we let HIM 'get the job done'. He's NOT going to tell us anything that might make us 'mad' at him....
That's about all anyone can hope for. Want the 'truth'? Ask your favorite bartender. You won't get it from anyone in public office.
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
I am starting to see more and more red flags lately and I do not trust the guy. Today, Chris Wallace asked Axelrod about the Fairness Doctrine and his answer was very evasive, he said something like "Well, you need to ask the head of the FCC.." Well, if Obama was totally opposed to the Fairness Doctrine, I think Axelrod would have said something like "President Obama does not support the Fairness Doctrine" but instead he totally avoided the question. What is next? The Government telling people what they should and should not eat? Ridiculous!
Yeah! let's go with Dubay...more jobs sent off-shores, less wages for American workers, more tax breaks for U.S. companies sending/outsourcing jobs/work elsewhere, bigger pay/bonuses for excecutives,..etc
and may be another war...with reliable intel.
Of course, Obama is not going to tell the truth because HE knows the truth about voters: A lie is sweet in the beginning, bitter in the end; truth is bitter in the beginning, sweet in the end. Isn't that the REAL problem? That sweet tooth of the average voter?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
