Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-19-2009, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Indiana
1,333 posts, read 3,226,333 times
Reputation: 976

Advertisements

When this stimulus package proves to be a colossal waste of money that only succeeds in plunging our nation further into debt I hope you all cry off with his head like you did with Bush over every little thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2009, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Wichita,Kansas
2,732 posts, read 6,767,656 times
Reputation: 1371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadro77 View Post
When this stimulus package proves to be a colossal waste of money that only succeeds in plunging our nation further into debt I hope you all cry off with his head like you did with Bush over every little thing.

Theres so much in the bill that does nothing to create jobs..
And create jobs that will last!!!!!!!
If we are going to spend money we dont have, dont waste a dime!
How many money went to stupid digital tv coupons,National Endowment..
For the Arts,birth control education(overseas)Etc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Southeast
4,301 posts, read 7,034,703 times
Reputation: 1464
..There is plenty of stuff in the bill to create jobs. But jobs are something you do in high school or college, what we need are careers that actually last more than a year or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 08:24 AM
 
16 posts, read 24,125 times
Reputation: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie117 View Post
..There is plenty of stuff in the bill to create jobs. But jobs are something you do in high school or college, what we need are careers that actually last more than a year or two.
are you supposed to be rewarded a nice cushy career because you are breathing and an american
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 09:04 AM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,683,672 times
Reputation: 1962
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Well they are at it again. If there is one thing the conservatives know how to do it is to tell a LIE. And they are good at it. Tell a lie over and over and long enough and soon people will think the lie is the truth.
Now they are trashing FDR and the New Deal with this line: "the New Deal and FDR'S government spending did not bring us out of the Depression but World War II did".
This of course is a LIE and if you think about it logically, it is also STUPID. The fact is that, even before WW2 unemployment had fallen over 10% from the time FDR took office until WW2. Yes, it was high at 14% but that was a hell of alot better than 25% when he took office. So while it did not "end" the Depression, it was on the way to doing so.
Secondly, how is it that WW2 "ended the Depression"? It is not because of the war but because of the GOVERNMENT SPENDING on the war! It was because the US Government was spending 25% of GDP on tanks, guns, planes, ships and everything else! It does not matter if the government is spending on guns or on bridges and schools- it is still government spending that creates jobs in the economy!
The difference here is a critical one- war spending does not have any future multiplier. Once you buy a tank, it is either destroyed in the war or mothballed after the war. It does not have an ongoing benefit to the country or to the economy. If you build a highway, bridge or school, that has a great multiplier to the economy. People continue to use that for economic activity AFTER the project is finished. It leads to permanent employment of highway workers, state police officers, teachers, firefighters and paramedics. It leads of private employment of warehouse workers, truck drivers and others.
So Obama really has the right idea here. He is effectively having a WW 2 spending program- without the war itself!

Ahh yes even if we can agree on what the government spendings money on they werent in debt like we are now and most importantly what happened when the war was over. Government didnt just stop it grew and found new ways to waste money. But then again to defend a country actually is something in the constitution and money can be used for that. NOT BAILING OUT auto makers and homeowners and whatelse they thru in this bill, like a new park in california <----- really
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 10:01 AM
 
4,989 posts, read 10,023,483 times
Reputation: 3285
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Well they are at it again. If there is one thing the conservatives know how to do it is to tell a LIE. And they are good at it. Tell a lie over and over and long enough and soon people will think the lie is the truth.
Now they are trashing FDR and the New Deal with this line: "the New Deal and FDR'S government spending did not bring us out of the Depression but World War II did".
This of course is a LIE and if you think about it logically, it is also STUPID. The fact is that, even before WW2 unemployment had fallen over 10% from the time FDR took office until WW2. Yes, it was high at 14% but that was a hell of alot better than 25% when he took office. So while it did not "end" the Depression, it was on the way to doing so.
Secondly, how is it that WW2 "ended the Depression"? It is not because of the war but because of the GOVERNMENT SPENDING on the war! It was because the US Government was spending 25% of GDP on tanks, guns, planes, ships and everything else! It does not matter if the government is spending on guns or on bridges and schools- it is still government spending that creates jobs in the economy!
The difference here is a critical one- war spending does not have any future multiplier. Once you buy a tank, it is either destroyed in the war or mothballed after the war. It does not have an ongoing benefit to the country or to the economy. If you build a highway, bridge or school, that has a great multiplier to the economy. People continue to use that for economic activity AFTER the project is finished. It leads to permanent employment of highway workers, state police officers, teachers, firefighters and paramedics. It leads of private employment of warehouse workers, truck drivers and others.
So Obama really has the right idea here. He is effectively having a WW 2 spending program- without the war itself!
You are in effect 180 off. World War II did have the effect of ending the Great Depression because it brought about a NET EXPANSION of the US economy in two ways. An increased manufacturing capacity to fill the production need of industrial goods not previously being produced, and a corresponding two fold increase in the demand for labor (troops being activated and workers needed to fill the expanding industrial base). And while the US economy did in fact naturally contract somewhat at the end of the war, the increased manufacturing base DID remain largely in production and net US industrial output continued at much higher than pre-war levels due to the widespread destruction of overseas manufacturing capacity, and subsequent rebuilding demand for US industrial goods abroad. By definition, expansion of an economy is the opposite of contraction (depression).

Obama’s “stimulus” package will not have the same effect because it will not EXPAND the US economy. It may re-employ people who recently lost their jobs, but does not result in a lasting net increase in demand because overseas capacity and competition does not change. Domestic infrastructure jobs are the ones without any “future multiplier” as you put it because they do little to stimulate increased demand once the initial capital expenditure is over. Only expansion of the manufacturing base into new areas to meet NEW demand has the multiplication effect you describe.

The one new area that Obama and the Dems are banking on to make their plan work is the increased production of green enery technology (wind turbines, PV panels, ect). However, it remains to bee seen if the demands for those types of goods would ever come close to the demand for tanks, guns etc as seen in WWII (particularly as a percentage of a now much higher GDP). And again, much of what will be produced today is done in automated factories that employ lower ratios of workers, or can be done with existing overseas capacity.

Your ignorance of basic economics does not make something a lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 10:15 AM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,848,248 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose Whisperer View Post
You are in effect 180 off. World War II did have the effect of ending the Great Depression because it brought about a NET EXPANSION of the US economy in two ways. An increased manufacturing capacity to fill the production need of industrial goods not previously being produced, and a corresponding two fold increase in the demand for labor (troops being activated and workers needed to fill the expanding industrial base). And while the US economy did in fact naturally contract somewhat at the end of the war, the increased manufacturing base DID remain largely in production and net US industrial output continued at much higher than pre-war levels due to the widespread destruction of overseas manufacturing capacity, and subsequent rebuilding demand for US industrial goods abroad. By definition, expansion of an economy is the opposite of contraction (depression)..
Thats what he said the war was the new deal on steriods. You are agreeing that government created jobs that didn't disappear but in fact continued and led to long term growth.

Quote:
Obama’s “stimulus” package will not have the same effect because it will not EXPAND the US economy. It may re-employ people who recently lost their jobs, but does not result in a lasting net increase in demand because overseas capacity and competition does not change. Domestic infrastructure jobs are the ones without any “future multiplier” as you put it because they do little to stimulate increased demand once the initial capital expenditure is over. Only expansion of the manufacturing base into new areas to meet NEW demand has the multiplication effect you describe.
I guess we can thank the republicans for ignoring our countries needs and we now have enough demand since we are about twenty five years behind. Hey I guess the stimulus is buying us plenty of time to create new demand.
Quote:
The one new area that Obama is banking on is the increased production of green enery technology (wind turbines, PV panels, ect). However, it remains to bee seen if the demands for the goods would ever come close to the demand for tanks, guns etc as seen in WWII (particularly as a percentage of a now much higher GDP). And again, much of what will be produced today is done in automated factories that employ lower ratios of workers, or can be done with existing overseas capacity
.
Yep so lets build new factories lots of jobs their. Make it less profitable to ship jobs overseas. I think Obama talked about it sounds like you are a fan.
Quote:
Your ignorance of basic economics does not make something a lie.
Perhaps you should educate us on what needs to be done since you agreed with Kev while saying that you don't .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 10:27 AM
 
2,265 posts, read 3,733,329 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
Well they are at it again. If there is one thing the conservatives know how to do it is to tell a LIE. And they are good at it. Tell a lie over and over and long enough and soon people will think the lie is the truth.
Now they are trashing FDR and the New Deal with this line: "the New Deal and FDR'S government spending did not bring us out of the Depression but World War II did".
This of course is a LIE and if you think about it logically, it is also STUPID. The fact is that, even before WW2 unemployment had fallen over 10% from the time FDR took office until WW2. Yes, it was high at 14% but that was a hell of alot better than 25% when he took office. So while it did not "end" the Depression, it was on the way to doing so.
Secondly, how is it that WW2 "ended the Depression"? It is not because of the war but because of the GOVERNMENT SPENDING on the war! It was because the US Government was spending 25% of GDP on tanks, guns, planes, ships and everything else! It does not matter if the government is spending on guns or on bridges and schools- it is still government spending that creates jobs in the economy!
The difference here is a critical one- war spending does not have any future multiplier. Once you buy a tank, it is either destroyed in the war or mothballed after the war. It does not have an ongoing benefit to the country or to the economy. If you build a highway, bridge or school, that has a great multiplier to the economy. People continue to use that for economic activity AFTER the project is finished. It leads to permanent employment of highway workers, state police officers, teachers, firefighters and paramedics. It leads of private employment of warehouse workers, truck drivers and others.
So Obama really has the right idea here. He is effectively having a WW 2 spending program- without the war itself!
The Great Depression era was a different time and a different world.
The comparisons of the latest stimulus to the new deal aren't accurate.
And around here on city data everyone thinks they are an economist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 10:31 AM
 
4,989 posts, read 10,023,483 times
Reputation: 3285
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamexican View Post
Perhaps you should educate us on what needs to be done since you agreed with Kev while saying that you don't .
First you would need to put on your reading glasses since you obviously didn't comprehend what was written in front of your face.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lamexican View Post
Thats what he said the war was the new deal on steriods. You are agreeing that government created jobs that didn't disappear but in fact continued and led to long term growth.
NO, the Government did not create those jobs. It is the demand for products that creates jobs i.e. the Market. In the case of WWII, the market demand was for more tanks, guns, etc. After the war, increased US manufacturing capacity remained in service because the demand for US goods continued in order to support the rebuilding efforts.

In the situation today the demand is for what exactly? Obama can build all of the factories he wants, but if there is no (or only a very small) demand for those products it is a waste of time and money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2009, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Dorchester
2,605 posts, read 4,844,527 times
Reputation: 1090
Quote:
Originally Posted by what. View Post
Conservative Republicans are the true scum of the earth, it started with Nixon, became accepted during the Reagan administration and we are just seeing the effects of their actions during the Bush era

Lets hope some how the Republican greed and dispicability will come to an end, these people have no role in any future humanity, it is a shame we cant do something about them as far as punishing them, but hopefully more people wake up, hopefully in a few years Fox News will have to go off the air because people will see what it really is, sadly there are still millions of people who are brainwashed by these people
Lol!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top